2.8 sec in total
430 ms
1.9 sec
376 ms
Visit feathrapp.com now to see the best up-to-date Feathr App content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about feathrapp.com
Unify your nonprofit marketing efforts in a single platform that offers detailed analytics, targeted digital advertising, social ads, peer-to-peer, and more.
Visit feathrapp.comWe analyzed Feathrapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
feathrapp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value2,050 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
430 ms
36 ms
90 ms
122 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Feathrapp.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) relates to the external source Feathr.co.
Page size can be reduced by 802.4 kB (44%)
1.8 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Feathrapp.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 722.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feathr App images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 441.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 441.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 303.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feathrapp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 303.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (81%)
47
9
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feathr App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
feathr.co
430 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
36 ms
front.css
90 ms
simple-author-box.min.css
122 ms
css
158 ms
bootstrap.min.css
112 ms
flat-ui.css
76 ms
font-awesome.min.css
686 ms
magnific.css
84 ms
pricing-table-global.css
126 ms
style.css
127 ms
jetpack.css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
159 ms
ga-scroll-events.js
151 ms
modernizr.custom.js
151 ms
magnific.min.js
159 ms
bootstrap.js
159 ms
retina.js
158 ms
Chart.js
163 ms
main.js
160 ms
load.sumome.com
613 ms
4938870068.js
224 ms
css
166 ms
css
178 ms
css
182 ms
feathr.co
239 ms
feathrUtm-1.0.2.js
215 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
147 ms
gprofiles.js
224 ms
wpgroho.js
167 ms
wp-embed.min.js
163 ms
count.js
163 ms
e-201611.js
150 ms
48a700265cb14d85bec760ecae73a9397f6c3593a74a4f6383548f3b57bb28c6
419 ms
event
392 ms
lato-regular-webfont.woff
286 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
328 ms
lato-light-webfont.woff
284 ms
lato-bold-webfont.woff
287 ms
MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
352 ms
lato-black-webfont.woff
282 ms
analytics.js
362 ms
Feathr_Logo_Color_500w.png
260 ms
Feathr_Logo_Light_500w.png
259 ms
NYCC-2014-Cosplayer2-trimmed.jpeg
419 ms
widgets.js
304 ms
0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
265 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
263 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
263 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
262 ms
count.js
341 ms
hovercard.css
143 ms
services.css
211 ms
g.gif
160 ms
core.js
205 ms
collect
57 ms
collect
96 ms
boomerang.min.js
17 ms
feathrapp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
feathrapp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
feathrapp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feathrapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feathrapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feathrapp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feathr App. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: