856 ms in total
209 ms
513 ms
134 ms
Click here to check amazing Feedingtree content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feedingtree.com
Checkout the full domain details of Feedingtree.com. Click Buy Now to instantly start the transaction or Make an offer to the seller!
Visit feedingtree.comWe analyzed Feedingtree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 647 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
feedingtree.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
209 ms
57 ms
13 ms
29 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Feedingtree.com, 92% (35 requests) were made to Perfectdomain.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (209 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedingtree.com.
Page size can be reduced by 43.3 kB (31%)
139.7 kB
96.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedingtree.com main page is 139.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 66.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Feedingtree needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 60% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 426 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedingtree.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (52%)
33
16
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedingtree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedingtree.com
209 ms
feedingtree.com
57 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
13 ms
bootstrap.first.min.css
29 ms
style.first.min.css
49 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
33 ms
js
67 ms
defer.js
39 ms
bootstrap.min.js
38 ms
ejs.min.js
84 ms
js.cookie.js
44 ms
style.min.js
46 ms
script.min.js
65 ms
gtm.js
54 ms
dn_icon.svg
22 ms
menu-icon.svg
23 ms
Shape10-min.svg
17 ms
placeholder.jpg
19 ms
noun_bulb_950363.svg
20 ms
stars-4.5.svg
31 ms
heart2.svg
32 ms
heart.svg
31 ms
angle-down.svg
37 ms
payment-option-paypal.png
35 ms
payment-option-visa.png
34 ms
payment-option-american.png
68 ms
payment-option-master.png
47 ms
payment-option-wire.png
53 ms
payment-option-bitcoin.png
52 ms
partner-godaddy-sized.png
51 ms
loading.gif
54 ms
Path8138.svg
62 ms
Group589.svg
78 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
32 ms
Roboto-Medium.woff
29 ms
Roboto-Regular.woff
30 ms
Roboto-Bold.woff
23 ms
bootstrap.min.js
58 ms
feedingtree.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
feedingtree.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
feedingtree.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedingtree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedingtree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedingtree.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedingtree. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: