2.6 sec in total
101 ms
1.8 sec
748 ms
Visit fhtm.com now to see the best up-to-date Fhtm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fhtm.com
Forsale Lander
Visit fhtm.comWe analyzed Fhtm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
fhtm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value2,990 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
101 ms
698 ms
124 ms
181 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fhtm.com, 62% (18 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 24% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (698 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.5 kB (49%)
160.5 kB
82.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Fhtm.com main page is 160.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 107.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fhtm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fhtm.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)
27
3
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fhtm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fhtm.com
101 ms
fhtm.com
698 ms
uxcore2.min.css
124 ms
noheader.min.css
181 ms
6116094e92ec0171.css
69 ms
f3d7d266c35baf54.css
121 ms
8210b14763457e23.css
185 ms
polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js
185 ms
853.7d7067fffa72ef90.js
183 ms
webpack-20b6a7dac850dbb3.js
183 ms
main-999f8182f179b553.js
167 ms
framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js
319 ms
_app-4df5320ba9e82638.js
401 ms
670-e807ace496afef9f.js
397 ms
878-f974ad59585aaeb8.js
319 ms
787-3cf420b3b3925473.js
503 ms
%5Bdomain%5D-61c714b520d2a5e4.js
439 ms
_buildManifest.js
436 ms
_ssgManifest.js
390 ms
_middlewareManifest.js
386 ms
polyfill.min.js
167 ms
uxcore2.min.js
152 ms
vendor~uxcore2.min.js
167 ms
heartbeat.js
291 ms
noheader.min.js
291 ms
MCB7T-RXHNH-PGQRJ-J6HWP-UGRWC
576 ms
aksb.min.js
670 ms
image
594 ms
utag.js
370 ms
fhtm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
fhtm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fhtm.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fhtm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fhtm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fhtm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fhtm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: