2.3 sec in total
369 ms
1.8 sec
124 ms
Click here to check amazing Fidalgo content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fidalgo.net
Visit fidalgo.netWe analyzed Fidalgo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
fidalgo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
369 ms
293 ms
185 ms
364 ms
649 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fidalgo.net, 97% (28 requests) were made to Home.fidalgo.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Home.fidalgo.net.
Page size can be reduced by 20.6 kB (13%)
159.0 kB
138.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Fidalgo.net main page is 159.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 158.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 426 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 426 B or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fidalgo needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)
27
19
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fidalgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
fidalgo.net
369 ms
www.home.fidalgo.net
293 ms
header.asp
185 ms
navbar.asp
364 ms
main.asp
649 ms
back.gif
180 ms
logo_normal.gif
269 ms
message_center1.gif
181 ms
navbar_01.gif
95 ms
navbar_02.gif
183 ms
white_bullet.gif
184 ms
setup_software1.gif
184 ms
usage_meter1.gif
264 ms
network_status1.gif
268 ms
navbar_04.gif
93 ms
fidnetoemlogo.gif
184 ms
comcast_dealer.jpg
185 ms
index_01.jpg
182 ms
SPACER.gif
90 ms
index_02.gif
92 ms
index_03.gif
93 ms
index_04.gif
94 ms
index_05.gif
90 ms
index_06.gif
169 ms
index_07.gif
175 ms
quick_connect_01.gif
174 ms
quick_connect_02.gif
177 ms
quick_connect_03.gif
183 ms
xfinity_ad_box_c.jpg
526 ms
fidalgo.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
fidalgo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
fidalgo.net SEO score
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fidalgo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fidalgo.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
fidalgo.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fidalgo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: