Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

fidalgo.net

Fidalgo Networking - ISP, Computer Sales and Repair

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

fidalgo.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fidalgo content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fidalgo.net

Visit fidalgo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Fidalgo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fidalgo.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fidalgo.net

369 ms

www.home.fidalgo.net

293 ms

header.asp

185 ms

navbar.asp

364 ms

main.asp

649 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fidalgo.net, 97% (28 requests) were made to Home.fidalgo.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) relates to the external source Home.fidalgo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

159.0 kB

After Optimization

138.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Fidalgo.net main page is 159.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 158.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 426 B

  • Original 829 B
  • After minification 808 B
  • After compression 403 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 426 B or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 158.2 kB
  • After minification 138.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fidalgo needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fidalgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fidalgo.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

fidalgo.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

fidalgo.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fidalgo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fidalgo.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fidalgo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: