Tools & Wizards About Us
filecamp.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

filecamp.net

Digital Asset Management | Media Library | Online Proofing

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

716 ms

Page Rendered

301 ms

filecamp.net screenshot

About Website

Visit filecamp.net now to see the best up-to-date Filecamp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filecamp.net

Lightweight, cloud-based Digital Asset Management trusted by global clients like Coca-Cola, Unilever & HBO. Get started in 5 minutes!

Visit filecamp.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Filecamp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filecamp.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,370 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filecamp.com

26 ms

filecamp.com

58 ms

script.js

91 ms

conversion.js

95 ms

wp-embed.min.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Filecamp.net, 35% (20 requests) were made to D1yktbmmb37pm4.cloudfront.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.1 kB (41%)

Content Size

289.8 kB

After Optimization

169.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filecamp.net main page is 289.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 133.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 108.3 kB

  • Original 133.0 kB
  • After minification 131.7 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 536 B

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 99.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filecamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 61 B

  • Original 42.7 kB
  • After minification 42.7 kB
  • After compression 42.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filecamp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filecamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filecamp.com

filecamp.com

26 ms

filecamp.com

filecamp.com

58 ms

script.js

script.js

91 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

95 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

92 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

93 ms

style.css

style.css

4 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

20 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

206 ms

cobham_reference_logo1.png

cobham_reference_logo1.png

190 ms

fsc_reference_logo1.png

fsc_reference_logo1.png

190 ms

hbo_reference_logo1.png

hbo_reference_logo1.png

190 ms

imagebank1.png

imagebank1.png

189 ms

permissions1.png

permissions1.png

189 ms

customization1.png

customization1.png

189 ms

labels1.png

labels1.png

196 ms

commenting.png

commenting.png

195 ms

collections1.png

collections1.png

195 ms

leigh-hatwell-150x150.jpg

leigh-hatwell-150x150.jpg

195 ms

Edward-Gooding-e1392568041366-150x150.jpg

Edward-Gooding-e1392568041366-150x150.jpg

195 ms

facebook_bc1394079131d7465678b2a70e610467.png

facebook_bc1394079131d7465678b2a70e610467.png

195 ms

twitter_new_15e7e60f6651418abf4de49f0a03e841.png

twitter_new_15e7e60f6651418abf4de49f0a03e841.png

199 ms

you_a7a06bf676ff1f26e969fa08346a37b4.png

you_a7a06bf676ff1f26e969fa08346a37b4.png

199 ms

vimeo_444dae5f1b1943c8881d0fd63d14b495.png

vimeo_444dae5f1b1943c8881d0fd63d14b495.png

199 ms

linkedin_51ffed7489b14beb253627300d50594e.png

linkedin_51ffed7489b14beb253627300d50594e.png

199 ms

gplus_45dece092d6be161fc2249655403f818.png

gplus_45dece092d6be161fc2249655403f818.png

198 ms

search-arrow.png

search-arrow.png

9 ms

script.js

script.js

19 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

63 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

62 ms

unilever_reference_logo1.png

unilever_reference_logo1.png

52 ms

wsj_reference_logo1.png

wsj_reference_logo1.png

174 ms

Filecamp-intro-movie_2014_900px.jpg

Filecamp-intro-movie_2014_900px.jpg

181 ms

filecamp-logo4.png

filecamp-logo4.png

174 ms

AVG_140x80.png

AVG_140x80.png

171 ms

163 ms

fsc_reference_logo1.png

fsc_reference_logo1.png

32 ms

imagebank1.png

imagebank1.png

33 ms

hbo_reference_logo1.png

hbo_reference_logo1.png

30 ms

permissions1.png

permissions1.png

30 ms

cobham_reference_logo1.png

cobham_reference_logo1.png

27 ms

customization1.png

customization1.png

28 ms

leigh-hatwell-150x150.jpg

leigh-hatwell-150x150.jpg

26 ms

facebook_bc1394079131d7465678b2a70e610467.png

facebook_bc1394079131d7465678b2a70e610467.png

27 ms

Edward-Gooding-e1392568041366-150x150.jpg

Edward-Gooding-e1392568041366-150x150.jpg

27 ms

labels1.png

labels1.png

27 ms

commenting.png

commenting.png

26 ms

collections1.png

collections1.png

24 ms

gplus_45dece092d6be161fc2249655403f818.png

gplus_45dece092d6be161fc2249655403f818.png

25 ms

linkedin_51ffed7489b14beb253627300d50594e.png

linkedin_51ffed7489b14beb253627300d50594e.png

25 ms

you_a7a06bf676ff1f26e969fa08346a37b4.png

you_a7a06bf676ff1f26e969fa08346a37b4.png

25 ms

vimeo_444dae5f1b1943c8881d0fd63d14b495.png

vimeo_444dae5f1b1943c8881d0fd63d14b495.png

23 ms

twitter_new_15e7e60f6651418abf4de49f0a03e841.png

twitter_new_15e7e60f6651418abf4de49f0a03e841.png

25 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

37 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

20 ms

Accessibility Review

filecamp.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

filecamp.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filecamp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filecamp.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

filecamp.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filecamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: