Tools & Wizards About Us
fileclub.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

fileclub.org

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

917 ms

Page Rendered

445 ms

fileclub.org screenshot

About Website

Visit fileclub.org now to see the best up-to-date Fileclub content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fileclub.org

Visit fileclub.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Fileclub.org page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fileclub.org performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fileclub.org

262 ms

style.css

118 ms

1cut_r1_c1.jpg

545 ms

1cut_r2_c2.jpg

291 ms

pic06.jpg

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Fileclub.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (634 ms) belongs to the original domain Fileclub.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

461.2 kB

After Optimization

390.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fileclub.org main page is 461.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 425.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 23.8 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 425.0 kB
  • After minification 387.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fileclub images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 784 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 841 B
  • After compression 276 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fileclub.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 784 B or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fileclub. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fileclub.org

fileclub.org

262 ms

style.css

style.css

118 ms

1cut_r1_c1.jpg

1cut_r1_c1.jpg

545 ms

1cut_r2_c2.jpg

1cut_r2_c2.jpg

291 ms

pic06.jpg

pic06.jpg

240 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

255 ms

seperate.jpg

seperate.jpg

293 ms

pic07.jpg

pic07.jpg

238 ms

pic08.jpg

pic08.jpg

307 ms

jfcairo.jpg

jfcairo.jpg

321 ms

pic09.jpg

pic09.jpg

331 ms

pic10.jpg

pic10.jpg

387 ms

pic11.jpg

pic11.jpg

377 ms

pic12.jpg

pic12.jpg

378 ms

pic13.jpg

pic13.jpg

397 ms

digitalliving.jpg

digitalliving.jpg

401 ms

etoile.jpg

etoile.jpg

450 ms

nuumuu.jpg

nuumuu.jpg

462 ms

pic05.jpg

pic05.jpg

454 ms

pic04.jpg

pic04.jpg

473 ms

pic03.jpg

pic03.jpg

473 ms

ligame01.jpg

ligame01.jpg

527 ms

pic01.jpg

pic01.jpg

517 ms

odec.jpg

odec.jpg

534 ms

00010.jpg

00010.jpg

576 ms

pic02.jpg

pic02.jpg

545 ms

00012.jpg

00012.jpg

592 ms

00013.jpg

00013.jpg

590 ms

00018.jpg

00018.jpg

603 ms

00026.jpg

00026.jpg

634 ms

Copy%20of%201cut_r2_c2.jpg

Copy%20of%201cut_r2_c2.jpg

620 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

543 ms

Accessibility Review

fileclub.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

fileclub.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fileclub.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fileclub.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fileclub.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

fileclub.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fileclub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: