21.4 sec in total
1.9 sec
10.8 sec
8.7 sec
Visit fileratings.com now to see the best up-to-date File Ratings content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fileratings.com
FileRatings.com provides downloads & popularity rankings for thousands of programs, videos & games across the entire web. Best rankings, best software downloads.
Visit fileratings.comWe analyzed Fileratings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 19.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
fileratings.com performance score
1916 ms
13 ms
616 ms
614 ms
591 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Fileratings.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dynamic.speedbit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fileratings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 674.3 kB (68%)
993.3 kB
319.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Fileratings.com main page is 993.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 680.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. File Ratings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 555.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 555.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fileratings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (74%)
73
19
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Ratings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fileratings.com
1916 ms
ga.js
13 ms
__utm.gif
616 ms
FRNew.css
614 ms
lstview.css
591 ms
ads9.dll
1301 ms
FeatureLoader.js.php
1298 ms
browser_detect.js
1307 ms
prototype.js
1369 ms
thumbnails.js
1337 ms
search.js
1274 ms
yahoo.js
1305 ms
event.js
1395 ms
container_core.js
2158 ms
animation-min.js
1336 ms
dom.js
1293 ms
connection-min.js
1378 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
2177 ms
dragdrop-min.js
2012 ms
slider-min.js
2145 ms
autocomplete-min.js
2061 ms
json.js
2145 ms
listitemviewer.js
2173 ms
frlogo.gif
2171 ms
up.gif
1618 ms
FR_category.gif
1482 ms
down.gif
1602 ms
fr_tmpl_01.gif
1402 ms
cherries_s.gif
1402 ms
num_01.gif
1400 ms
rate_it.gif
1402 ms
NewFR_41.gif
1376 ms
num_02.gif
1312 ms
chart_star_35.gif
1310 ms
num_03.gif
1374 ms
chart_star_3.gif
1365 ms
num_04.gif
1348 ms
num_05.gif
1331 ms
num_06.gif
1324 ms
num_07.gif
1377 ms
num_08.gif
1371 ms
num_09.gif
1346 ms
num_10.gif
1345 ms
num_11.gif
1345 ms
num_12.gif
1344 ms
num_13.gif
1327 ms
DAP-banner-728x90-v-fastest-easiest.jpg
1493 ms
num_14.gif
1248 ms
num_15.gif
1314 ms
num_16.gif
1313 ms
num_17.gif
1283 ms
num_18.gif
1282 ms
num_19.gif
1281 ms
num_20.gif
1224 ms
arrow_d.gif
1190 ms
arrow_u.gif
577 ms
arrow_d5.gif
529 ms
arrow_u5.gif
529 ms
arrow_d10.gif
446 ms
arrow_u10.gif
446 ms
legend_bot648.gif
445 ms
NewFR_79.gif
381 ms
fr_tmpl_03.gif
382 ms
speedbitlogo.gif
415 ms
active_tab.gif
149 ms
unactive_tab.gif
950 ms
fr_tmpl_02.gif
949 ms
table-top648.gif
464 ms
ads9.dll
1940 ms
table-mid648.gif
1750 ms
table-bot648.gif
1749 ms
legend_top648.gif
1749 ms
games_03.gif
1749 ms
NewFR_29.gif
1748 ms
DAP-banner-160x600-v-fastest-easiest.jpg
1022 ms
fileratings.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fileratings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fileratings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fileratings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Ratings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: