5 sec in total
Click here to check amazing Files content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about files.construction
The largest digital marketplace for construction documents, templates, procedures, resources, building codes and more.Visit files.construction
We analyzed Files.construction page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
files.construction performance score
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Files.construction, 5% (1 request) were made to Cdn.mxpnl.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Essential.construction. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (650 ms) belongs to the original domain Files.construction.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (84%)
In fact, the total size of Files.construction main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 700 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Files images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 78 B
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)
files.construction accessibility score
Names and labels
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
files.construction best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Browser errors were logged to the console
files.construction SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Document uses legible font sizes
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Files.construction can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Files.construction main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Files. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: