Tools & Wizards About Us
filesharingtalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

706 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

328 ms

filesharingtalk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit filesharingtalk.com now to see the best up-to-date File Sharing Talk content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filesharingtalk.com

Visit filesharingtalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filesharingtalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 706 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filesharingtalk.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

706 ms

combo

6 ms

vbulletin-core.js

394 ms

css.php

109 ms

css.php

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Filesharingtalk.com, 37% (25 requests) were made to I.fststatic.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to S.fststatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Filesharingtalk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 669.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filesharingtalk.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 64.5 kB

  • Original 78.7 kB
  • After minification 70.6 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 133.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 880.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, File Sharing Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 329.5 kB

  • Original 463.1 kB
  • After minification 415.9 kB
  • After compression 133.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 329.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 141.7 kB

  • Original 168.9 kB
  • After minification 130.0 kB
  • After compression 27.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filesharingtalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (59%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Sharing Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

706 ms

combo

combo

6 ms

vbulletin-core.js

vbulletin-core.js

394 ms

css.php

css.php

109 ms

css.php

css.php

95 ms

vbulletin_overlay.js

vbulletin_overlay.js

375 ms

vbulletin_cms.js

vbulletin_cms.js

369 ms

vbulletin_ajax_htmlloader.js

vbulletin_ajax_htmlloader.js

370 ms

css.php

css.php

61 ms

fst.js

fst.js

370 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

372 ms

ga.js

ga.js

4 ms

adblock_detector.js

adblock_detector.js

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

vbulletin_lightbox.js

vbulletin_lightbox.js

342 ms

css.php

css.php

38 ms

filesharingtalk.png

filesharingtalk.png

427 ms

yah-60-left.gif

yah-60-left.gif

224 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

82 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

64 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

82 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

96 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

79 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

88 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

139 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

130 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

109 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

121 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

141 ms

attachment.php

attachment.php

150 ms

clear.gif

clear.gif

124 ms

cron.php

cron.php

158 ms

search.png

search.png

412 ms

navbit-home.png

navbit-home.png

412 ms

categories.png

categories.png

413 ms

sections.png

sections.png

412 ms

html.png

html.png

413 ms

rss_40b.png

rss_40b.png

424 ms

read_more-right.png

read_more-right.png

425 ms

firstnew-comment.png

firstnew-comment.png

430 ms

next-right.png

next-right.png

428 ms

widget-blog.png

widget-blog.png

430 ms

widget-forum.png

widget-forum.png

435 ms

unknown.gif

unknown.gif

436 ms

lastpost-right.png

lastpost-right.png

436 ms

avatar31482_16.gif

avatar31482_16.gif

437 ms

avatar132_3.gif

avatar132_3.gif

450 ms

stat_time.png

stat_time.png

438 ms

stat_queries.png

stat_queries.png

447 ms

vr.gif

vr.gif

292 ms

yah-60-right.gif

yah-60-right.gif

220 ms

yah-90-left.gif

yah-90-left.gif

221 ms

fg.gif

fg.gif

270 ms

yah-90-right.gif

yah-90-right.gif

223 ms

fggg.gif

fggg.gif

266 ms

top-highlight.png

top-highlight.png

124 ms

gradient-black-down.png

gradient-black-down.png

129 ms

navbit-arrow-right.png

navbit-arrow-right.png

437 ms

treeview-min.js

treeview-min.js

10 ms

treeview.css

treeview.css

4 ms

rating-15_5.png

rating-15_5.png

406 ms

rating-15_4.png

rating-15_4.png

407 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

393 ms

icons.png

icons.png

451 ms

ajax.php

ajax.php

160 ms

progress2.gif

progress2.gif

184 ms

lightbox_progress.gif

lightbox_progress.gif

185 ms

Accessibility Review

filesharingtalk.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

filesharingtalk.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

filesharingtalk.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filesharingtalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Filesharingtalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

filesharingtalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Sharing Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: