5 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.4 sec
251 ms
Click here to check amazing Filestream System S content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filestreamsystems.co.uk
Document management software systems by Filestream Ltd. EDMS for fast and secure electronic document storage, workflow, archiving and retrieval.
Visit filestreamsystems.co.ukWe analyzed Filestreamsystems.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
filestreamsystems.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.914
3/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
1309 ms
419 ms
44 ms
475 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Filestreamsystems.co.uk, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Filestreamsystems.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 480.7 kB (33%)
1.4 MB
956.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Filestreamsystems.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filestream System S needs image optimization as it can save up to 133.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 295.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filestreamsystems.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (15%)
39
33
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filestream System S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
filestreamsystems.co.uk
1309 ms
www.filestreamsystems.co.uk
419 ms
css
44 ms
icons.css
475 ms
style.css
167 ms
magnific-popup.css
50 ms
jquery.js
52 ms
assets.js
249 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
44 ms
javascript.js
171 ms
logo.png
180 ms
home-01.jpg
345 ms
home-02.jpg
426 ms
braemar.jpg
406 ms
breyer.jpg
333 ms
carnival.jpg
407 ms
claygate.jpg
411 ms
environment_agency.jpg
563 ms
goodwood.jpg
564 ms
health_partners.jpg
648 ms
hull.jpg
650 ms
international_ship.jpg
584 ms
kingsley_healthcare.jpg
666 ms
link_group.jpg
650 ms
liverpool.jpg
732 ms
metrobank1.jpg
740 ms
mha.jpg
801 ms
murray_beith.jpg
876 ms
nugent_care.jpg
810 ms
oxford_instruments.jpg
907 ms
r_w.jpg
975 ms
scania.jpg
901 ms
stobart_group.jpg
1043 ms
umg.jpg
972 ms
velosi.jpg
1116 ms
contact-icon.png
576 ms
google-plus-icon.png
582 ms
twitter-icon.png
650 ms
primary-bg.png
1171 ms
li.gif
706 ms
arrow.svg
681 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
15 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
16 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
16 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
19 ms
filestreamsystems.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
filestreamsystems.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
filestreamsystems.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filestreamsystems.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filestreamsystems.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filestreamsystems.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filestream System S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: