3.6 sec in total
250 ms
3.2 sec
143 ms
Welcome to filter-bio.com homepage info - get ready to check FILTERBIO best content right away, or after learning these important things about filter-bio.com
Experiencing in manufacturing quality filters of different types, FILTERBIO is also well-known in Europe, South America, South Asia, etc for its satisfactory syringe filter service. Welcome to get qua...
Visit filter-bio.comWe analyzed Filter-bio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
filter-bio.com performance score
250 ms
523 ms
1354 ms
286 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Filter-bio.com, 23% (14 requests) were made to Css02.v15cdn.com and 21% (13 requests) were made to Img01.v15cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Css02.v15cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 113.5 kB (15%)
745.2 kB
631.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Filter-bio.com main page is 745.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 343.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FILTERBIO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.7 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filter-bio.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (49%)
57
29
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FILTERBIO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
filter-bio.com
250 ms
www.filter-bio.com
523 ms
style.css
1354 ms
jquery.js
286 ms
sitecommon.js
286 ms
other.css
76 ms
js
76 ms
Site_Common.js
295 ms
focus.js
296 ms
count2.js
295 ms
foucs.js
350 ms
gtm.js
103 ms
logo91544.png
185 ms
amore.webp
268 ms
DSQpTEz87nc
195 ms
libg.png
701 ms
bg1.jpg
795 ms
dot.jpg
831 ms
download.jpg
144 ms
project.jpg
145 ms
zshu.jpg
145 ms
bottom_rightline.jpg
191 ms
bottom_tel_bg.jpg
198 ms
facebook.jpg
198 ms
twitter.jpg
289 ms
linkedin.jpg
289 ms
vk.jpg
247 ms
pinterest.jpg
295 ms
search_go.jpg
690 ms
201608301532305486607.jpg
776 ms
201608170953438584834.jpg
698 ms
201608170953519209342.jpg
700 ms
ba202210271350404083559.jpg
698 ms
bae0dee9f8-1e6d-44e1-a669-83b20fa5a0db.jpg
699 ms
1.jpg
695 ms
2.jpg
698 ms
3.jpg
700 ms
en.webp
292 ms
ua.webp
292 ms
ar.webp
292 ms
ca.webp
304 ms
tlh.webp
691 ms
srcyrl.webp
542 ms
bg.webp
691 ms
se.webp
688 ms
il.webp
691 ms
es.webp
688 ms
dk.webp
686 ms
srla.webp
690 ms
s
715 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
collect
98 ms
www-player.css
23 ms
www-embed-player.js
74 ms
base.js
128 ms
js
453 ms
ad_status.js
284 ms
0o2vSHmH6ApOX27UzDeaY_GD7faOtklBjWYygVKryhI.js
208 ms
embed.js
98 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
64 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
68 ms
id
48 ms
filter-bio.com SEO score
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filter-bio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filter-bio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filter-bio.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FILTERBIO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: