Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

filtration.cc

自清洗过滤器|全自动过滤器|反冲洗过滤器|刮刀自清洗过滤器|高粘度液体自清洗过滤器|浆料自清洗过滤器|浆料过滤器|全自动永磁过滤器|永磁除铁器|固液分离器|袋式过滤器|旋液分离器|大流量过滤器|篮式过滤器

Page Load Speed

11.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

filtration.cc screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filtration.cc homepage info - get ready to check Filtration best content right away, or after learning these important things about filtration.cc

全自动过滤器,自清洗过滤器,反冲洗过滤器,浆料自清洗过滤器,全自动永磁分离器,全自动永磁过滤器,离心式固液分离器,刮刀式自清洗过滤器,大流量过滤器,防腐工业过滤器专业生产厂家:南通星韦汇达过滤工艺技术有限公司,专注于液体领域的过滤、分离与净化!咨询电话:15002150001

Visit filtration.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtration.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtration.cc performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2.141

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filtration.cc

1482 ms

filtration.cc.css

522 ms

SpryTabbedPanels.css

521 ms

analytics.js

553 ms

filtration.cc.js

1078 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Filtration.cc, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Filtration.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (13%)

Content Size

17.2 MB

After Optimization

14.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Filtration.cc main page is 17.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 16.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 180.1 kB

  • Original 195.2 kB
  • After minification 185.0 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 16.6 MB
  • After minification 14.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filtration needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 193.6 kB

  • Original 356.6 kB
  • After minification 356.6 kB
  • After compression 163.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtration.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (15%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

92

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtration. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

filtration.cc accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

filtration.cc best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

filtration.cc SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtration.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filtration.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filtration. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: