Tools & Wizards About Us
finchpark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 42

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

finchpark.com

finchpark ELT Resources

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

686 ms

Page Rendered

168 ms

finchpark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Finchpark content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about finchpark.com

Visit finchpark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Finchpark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 854 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finchpark.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.486

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

finchpark.com

230 ms

css

24 ms

style.css

67 ms

quotes.js

128 ms

sitelock.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Finchpark.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Shield.sitelock.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (386 ms) belongs to the original domain Finchpark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.7 kB (12%)

Content Size

186.1 kB

After Optimization

163.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Finchpark.com main page is 186.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 156.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 630 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 156.2 kB
  • After minification 154.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Finchpark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 17.7 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finchpark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finchpark. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

finchpark.com

finchpark.com

230 ms

css

css

24 ms

style.css

style.css

67 ms

quotes.js

quotes.js

128 ms

sitelock.js

sitelock.js

59 ms

finchpark.com

finchpark.com

43 ms

img01.jpg

img01.jpg

67 ms

img02.jpg

img02.jpg

201 ms

img04.jpg

img04.jpg

128 ms

header-17.jpg

header-17.jpg

386 ms

img05.jpg

img05.jpg

128 ms

img04.png

img04.png

69 ms

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf

5 ms

Accessibility Review

finchpark.com accessibility score

42

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

finchpark.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

finchpark.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finchpark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Finchpark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

finchpark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Finchpark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: