Tools & Wizards About Us
finetec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

finetec.com

We are Exclusive Networks - Digital Infrastructure and Cybersecurity Specialists

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

316 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

394 ms

finetec.com screenshot

About Website

Visit finetec.com now to see the best up-to-date Finetec content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about finetec.com

A global trusted cybersecurity specialist working with reseller partners to increase opportunities in the technological landscape.

Visit finetec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Finetec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finetec.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,450 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

finetec.com

316 ms

usa

163 ms

503 ms

styles.css

148 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

224 ms

Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Finetec.com, 89% (118 requests) were made to Exclusive-networks.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Exclusive-networks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Finetec.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 145.4 kB

  • Original 174.0 kB
  • After minification 162.7 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 130.9 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Finetec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 581.5 kB
  • After minification 581.5 kB
  • After compression 561.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 82.5 kB
  • After minification 82.5 kB
  • After compression 75.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finetec.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (46%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

68

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finetec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

finetec.com

finetec.com

316 ms

usa

usa

163 ms

503 ms

styles.css

styles.css

148 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

224 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

225 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

233 ms

app.css

app.css

334 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

243 ms

style_login_widget.css

style_login_widget.css

240 ms

style.css

style.css

298 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

299 ms

jquery.signature.css

jquery.signature.css

308 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

417 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

323 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

389 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

373 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

383 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

400 ms

jquery.signature.js

jquery.signature.js

413 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

448 ms

cf7_signature.js

cf7_signature.js

459 ms

js

js

72 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

508 ms

OverlayScrollbars.min.css

OverlayScrollbars.min.css

481 ms

aes.js

aes.js

485 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

428 ms

index.js

index.js

523 ms

index.js

index.js

522 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

523 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

605 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

552 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

523 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

545 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

562 ms

index.js

index.js

567 ms

what-input.min.js

what-input.min.js

593 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

778 ms

lity.min.js

lity.min.js

632 ms

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js

681 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

607 ms

exn-logo-white.svg

exn-logo-white.svg

217 ms

flag_usa.svg

flag_usa.svg

218 ms

globe-p.svg

globe-p.svg

247 ms

flag_africa.svg

flag_africa.svg

281 ms

south_africa.svg

south_africa.svg

280 ms

adriatic_albania.svg

adriatic_albania.svg

283 ms

flag_australia.svg

flag_australia.svg

297 ms

flag_austria.svg

flag_austria.svg

547 ms

flag_belgium.svg

flag_belgium.svg

561 ms

adriatic_bosnia-herzegovina.svg

adriatic_bosnia-herzegovina.svg

579 ms

adriatic_bulgaria.svg

adriatic_bulgaria.svg

581 ms

canada-flag.svg

canada-flag.svg

581 ms

canada-flag.svg

canada-flag.svg

582 ms

adriatic_croatia.svg

adriatic_croatia.svg

583 ms

adriatic_czechia.svg

adriatic_czechia.svg

586 ms

denmark-flag.svg

denmark-flag.svg

588 ms

adriatic_estonia.svg

adriatic_estonia.svg

587 ms

flag_finland.svg

flag_finland.svg

589 ms

flag_finland.svg

flag_finland.svg

602 ms

france-flag-round.svg

france-flag-round.svg

601 ms

flag_germany.svg

flag_germany.svg

599 ms

formsubmittoken

formsubmittoken

719 ms

flag-artwork-28.svg

flag-artwork-28.svg

557 ms

adriatic_hungary.svg

adriatic_hungary.svg

545 ms

iceland.svg

iceland.svg

542 ms

india-flag.svg

india-flag.svg

687 ms

indoniesia-flag.svg

indoniesia-flag.svg

704 ms

ireland-flag.svg

ireland-flag.svg

682 ms

israel-flag.svg

israel-flag.svg

675 ms

flag_italy.svg

flag_italy.svg

646 ms

adriatic_kosovo.svg

adriatic_kosovo.svg

661 ms

adriatic_latvia.svg

adriatic_latvia.svg

691 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

23 ms

adriatic_lithuania.svg

adriatic_lithuania.svg

634 ms

malaysia-flag.svg

malaysia-flag.svg

651 ms

flag_middle-east.svg

flag_middle-east.svg

606 ms

adriatic_montenegro.svg

adriatic_montenegro.svg

609 ms

flag_netherlands.svg

flag_netherlands.svg

603 ms

flag_new-zealand.svg

flag_new-zealand.svg

658 ms

adriatic_macedonia.svg

adriatic_macedonia.svg

633 ms

flag_norway.svg

flag_norway.svg

609 ms

philippines-flag.svg

philippines-flag.svg

609 ms

adriatic_poland.svg

adriatic_poland.svg

610 ms

flag_portugal.svg

flag_portugal.svg

617 ms

anchor

anchor

116 ms

adriatic_romania.svg

adriatic_romania.svg

404 ms

saudi-arabia-flag.svg

saudi-arabia-flag.svg

383 ms

adriatic_serbia.svg

adriatic_serbia.svg

437 ms

singapore-flag.svg

singapore-flag.svg

389 ms

adriatic_slovakia.svg

adriatic_slovakia.svg

388 ms

adriatic_slovenia.svg

adriatic_slovenia.svg

408 ms

flag_spain.svg

flag_spain.svg

461 ms

flag_sweden.svg

flag_sweden.svg

455 ms

flag_switzerland-24.svg

flag_switzerland-24.svg

455 ms

flag_switzerland-24.svg

flag_switzerland-24.svg

455 ms

thailand-flag.svg

thailand-flag.svg

478 ms

flag_turkey.svg

flag_turkey.svg

505 ms

adriatic_ukraine-2.svg

adriatic_ukraine-2.svg

510 ms

flag_uk.svg

flag_uk.svg

517 ms

vietnam-flag.svg

vietnam-flag.svg

527 ms

search-white.svg

search-white.svg

516 ms

xod-logo-white.svg

xod-logo-white.svg

523 ms

scroll-down-icon.png

scroll-down-icon.png

560 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

3 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

10 ms

PSKopaksc4v0TeE9MSufUBd6uLsTLN3_1JKIESb4JYg.js

PSKopaksc4v0TeE9MSufUBd6uLsTLN3_1JKIESb4JYg.js

111 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

106 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

100 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

61 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

62 ms

fast-facts.jpg

fast-facts.jpg

440 ms

notes-multicolour.svg

notes-multicolour.svg

437 ms

globe-multicolour.svg

globe-multicolour.svg

434 ms

Orange-Purple-Home-Icon-2.svg

Orange-Purple-Home-Icon-2.svg

440 ms

Orange-Purple-Home-Icon-1.svg

Orange-Purple-Home-Icon-1.svg

456 ms

Exclusive-Access-Portal-Website-Ad-V2.png

Exclusive-Access-Portal-Website-Ad-V2.png

684 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

19 ms

Fortinet-1.png

Fortinet-1.png

542 ms

global-services-operations-1.png

global-services-operations-1.png

838 ms

managed-security-services-1.png

managed-security-services-1.png

729 ms

white-arrow.svg

white-arrow.svg

459 ms

home-x-od.png

home-x-od.png

1304 ms

pink-orange-zag-bg.jpg

pink-orange-zag-bg.jpg

564 ms

social-linkedin.svg

social-linkedin.svg

546 ms

social-facebook.svg

social-facebook.svg

583 ms

EXN%20icon_X.svg

EXN%20icon_X.svg

619 ms

social-you-tube.svg

social-you-tube.svg

632 ms

scroll-up-icon.png

scroll-up-icon.png

659 ms

pre-arrow-g.png

pre-arrow-g.png

661 ms

next-arrow-p.png

next-arrow-p.png

644 ms

Accessibility Review

finetec.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

finetec.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

finetec.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finetec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finetec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

finetec.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Finetec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: