Tools & Wizards About Us
fingerthink.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

fingerthink.com

Fingerthink Tap Into a $2.3 Billion Market Today!

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

fingerthink.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fingerthink content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fingerthink.com

We are revolutionizing the digital marketing game by specializing in finding Hispanic clients within the US. Now that you know the size of the opportunity, are you really going to pass it up?

Visit fingerthink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fingerthink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fingerthink.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fingerthink.com

169 ms

fingerthink.com

303 ms

css2

69 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

58 ms

flatpickr.min.css

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Fingerthink.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Fingerthink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.6 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fingerthink.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 85.8 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fingerthink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 906 B

  • Original 168.6 kB
  • After minification 168.6 kB
  • After compression 167.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 66.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fingerthink.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (38%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fingerthink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fingerthink.com

fingerthink.com

169 ms

fingerthink.com

fingerthink.com

303 ms

css2

css2

69 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

58 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

115 ms

lightgallery-bundle.min.css

lightgallery-bundle.min.css

169 ms

aos.css

aos.css

171 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

170 ms

theme4.css

theme4.css

279 ms

js

js

71 ms

js

js

119 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

224 ms

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

171 ms

aos.js

aos.js

221 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

224 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

223 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

225 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

418 ms

lightgallery.min.js

lightgallery.min.js

405 ms

lg-video.min.js

lg-video.min.js

403 ms

lg-fullscreen.min.js

lg-fullscreen.min.js

403 ms

lg-zoom.min.js

lg-zoom.min.js

405 ms

lg-thumbnail.min.js

lg-thumbnail.min.js

421 ms

leaflet.js

leaflet.js

442 ms

index.js

index.js

421 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

416 ms

hotjar-3442348.js

hotjar-3442348.js

186 ms

logo-fingerthink-col.svg

logo-fingerthink-col.svg

137 ms

logo-fingerthink-blanco.svg

logo-fingerthink-blanco.svg

135 ms

hipanos.jpg

hipanos.jpg

301 ms

dish-latino.jpg

dish-latino.jpg

300 ms

liberty-mutual.jpg

liberty-mutual.jpg

246 ms

ubcf-campaign.jpg

ubcf-campaign.jpg

221 ms

keches-lawfirm.jpg

keches-lawfirm.jpg

247 ms

logo-dish-latino-01.svg

logo-dish-latino-01.svg

192 ms

dish-blanco-01.svg

dish-blanco-01.svg

249 ms

logo-liberty-mutual-01.svg

logo-liberty-mutual-01.svg

277 ms

united-breast-cancer-foundation.png

united-breast-cancer-foundation.png

360 ms

logo-keches-lawfirm-01.svg

logo-keches-lawfirm-01.svg

302 ms

01-light.png

01-light.png

305 ms

01-dark.png

01-dark.png

333 ms

02-light.png

02-light.png

358 ms

02-dark.png

02-dark.png

358 ms

03-light.png

03-light.png

361 ms

03-dark.png

03-dark.png

419 ms

04-light.png

04-light.png

388 ms

04-dark.png

04-dark.png

414 ms

05-light.png

05-light.png

413 ms

05-dark.png

05-dark.png

416 ms

google-color-01.svg

google-color-01.svg

416 ms

meta-gray-01-01.svg

meta-gray-01-01.svg

444 ms

adroll-color.svg

adroll-color.svg

469 ms

outbrain-color-01.svg

outbrain-color-01.svg

470 ms

twillio-color-01.svg

twillio-color-01.svg

404 ms

hotjar-color.svg

hotjar-color.svg

404 ms

02-light.png

02-light.png

405 ms

02-dark.png

02-dark.png

430 ms

01-light.png

01-light.png

454 ms

around-icons.ttf

around-icons.ttf

440 ms

01-dark.png

01-dark.png

451 ms

03-light.png

03-light.png

452 ms

03-dark.png

03-dark.png

453 ms

hispanic-bg-mobile.png

hispanic-bg-mobile.png

592 ms

hispanic-bg.png

hispanic-bg.png

612 ms

Accessibility Review

fingerthink.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

fingerthink.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fingerthink.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fingerthink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fingerthink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fingerthink.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fingerthink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: