Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

160 ms

flash-filter.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to flash-filter.net homepage info - get ready to check Flash Filter best content right away, or after learning these important things about flash-filter.net

Visit flash-filter.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Flash-filter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flash-filter.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,150 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

253 ms

frontend.js

210 ms

sifr.js

318 ms

sifr_definitions.js

220 ms

swfobject.js

316 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Flash-filter.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) belongs to the original domain Flash-filter.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.5 kB (43%)

Content Size

131.4 kB

After Optimization

74.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Flash-filter.net main page is 131.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 74 B

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flash Filter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flash-filter.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (59%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flash Filter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

flash-filter.net accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

flash-filter.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

flash-filter.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flash-filter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Flash-filter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flash Filter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: