1.4 sec in total
51 ms
1.1 sec
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Flcc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flcc.us
Nestled in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, Forest Lake Country Club provides its members with the finest private club and golf experience in the surrounding area.
Visit flcc.usWe analyzed Flcc.us page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
flcc.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.143
78/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
51 ms
259 ms
124 ms
129 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Flcc.us, 24% (10 requests) were made to Static.clubessential.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Flcc.us.
Page size can be reduced by 213.9 kB (37%)
574.5 kB
360.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Flcc.us main page is 574.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 289.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flcc needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 56.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flcc.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.2 kB or 51% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (78%)
32
7
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flcc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flcc.us
51 ms
flcc.us
259 ms
css2
124 ms
nucleo-glyph.css
129 ms
nucleo-outline.css
144 ms
nucleo-mini.css
138 ms
jquery.min.js
63 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
122 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
193 ms
notify-custom.min.js
119 ms
axisScripts.js
125 ms
axisDialogBox.js
111 ms
global.css
119 ms
jquery-ui.css
190 ms
popper.min.js
184 ms
bootstrap.min.js
120 ms
style.css
283 ms
js
233 ms
WebResource.axd
301 ms
ScriptResource.axd
302 ms
ScriptResource.axd
276 ms
ScriptResource.axd
264 ms
ScriptResource.axd
301 ms
player.js
182 ms
overridePhotoAlbum.min.js
179 ms
responsiveAlbum.min.js
179 ms
globalScripts.js
261 ms
bootstrap.min.css
35 ms
Logo2x.png
26 ms
getImage.gif
350 ms
getImage.gif
273 ms
getImage.gif
281 ms
getImage.gif
456 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPrOQ.ttf
54 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TrOQ.ttf
55 ms
992438972
225 ms
nucleo-outline.woff
79 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
79 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
83 ms
nucleo-glyph.woff
78 ms
api.js
12 ms
flcc.us accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
flcc.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
flcc.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flcc.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flcc.us main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
flcc.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flcc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: