4.1 sec in total
804 ms
3.1 sec
158 ms
Click here to check amazing Flight Gear content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flightgear.org
Visit flightgear.orgWe analyzed Flightgear.org page load time and found that the first response time was 804 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
flightgear.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value24,980 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value39.2 s
0/100
10%
804 ms
147 ms
60 ms
151 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Flightgear.org, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Flightgear.org.
Page size can be reduced by 774.3 kB (14%)
5.7 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Flightgear.org main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flight Gear images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 437.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 437.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightgear.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (51%)
76
37
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flight Gear. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.flightgear.org
804 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
style.css
60 ms
dashicons.min.css
151 ms
desktop_style.css
60 ms
style.css
184 ms
responsive.css
149 ms
jquery.js
262 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
195 ms
front_end_script.js
195 ms
responsive-modernizr.min.js
250 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
nextgen_basic_slideshow.min.css
138 ms
trigger_buttons.min.css
174 ms
shutter.min.css
176 ms
font-awesome.min.css
260 ms
nggallery.css
225 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
217 ms
responsive-scripts.min.js
277 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
239 ms
wp-embed.min.js
238 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
294 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
289 ms
ajax.min.js
355 ms
common.min.js
353 ms
nextgen_basic_slideshow.min.js
352 ms
lightbox_context.min.js
353 ms
shutter.min.js
369 ms
nextgen_shutter.min.js
356 ms
ga.js
47 ms
cropped-cropped-FlightGear-header-73711.jpg
295 ms
fgfs-screen-010.jpg
418 ms
fgfs-screen-017.jpg
355 ms
fgfs-screen-040.jpg
389 ms
fgfs-screen-045.jpg
516 ms
fgfs-screen-103.jpg
527 ms
fgfs-screen-104.jpg
610 ms
fgfs-screen-105.jpg
657 ms
fgfs-screen-106.jpg
665 ms
fgfs-screen-107.jpg
730 ms
fgfs-screen-123.jpg
734 ms
fgfs-screen-140.jpg
720 ms
fgfs-screen-166.jpg
931 ms
fgfs-screen-177.jpg
975 ms
fgfs-screen-582.jpg
926 ms
fgfs-screen-597.jpg
977 ms
fgfs-screen-017_0.jpg
972 ms
fgfs-screen-114.jpg
1008 ms
fgfs-screen-115.jpg
1171 ms
fgfs-screen-117.jpg
1219 ms
fgfs-screen-039.jpg
1259 ms
fgfs-screen-049.jpg
1186 ms
fgfs-screen-054.jpg
1288 ms
ca-pub-2485404446552133.js
90 ms
zrt_lookup.html
138 ms
show_ads_impl.js
88 ms
fgfs-screen-070.jpg
1272 ms
fgfs-screen-077.jpg
1418 ms
fgfs-screen-086.jpg
1432 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
fgfs-screen-092.jpg
1352 ms
loader.gif
1247 ms
facebook-icon.png
1248 ms
youtube-icon.png
1253 ms
ads
282 ms
googleplus-icon.png
1242 ms
osd.js
78 ms
ads
230 ms
ads
235 ms
m_js_controller.js
29 ms
abg.js
43 ms
favicon
83 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
72 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
34 ms
s
28 ms
x_button_blue2.png
29 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
17 ms
placeholder.gif
30 ms
ui
35 ms
flightgear.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
flightgear.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
flightgear.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightgear.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flightgear.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flightgear.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flight Gear. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: