5.9 sec in total
817 ms
4.9 sec
206 ms
Visit floorwalk.in now to see the best up-to-date Floor Walk content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about floorwalk.in
FloorWalk provides a range of services from Market Research, Competition benchmarking & Retail Audits. It has also been named as one of the leading Mystery Shopping companies in India by various journ...
Visit floorwalk.inWe analyzed Floorwalk.in page load time and found that the first response time was 817 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
floorwalk.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value3,780 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.882
3/100
15%
Value31.9 s
0/100
10%
817 ms
120 ms
28 ms
528 ms
536 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Floorwalk.in, 59% (42 requests) were made to Images.floorwalk.in and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Images.floorwalk.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (41%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Floorwalk.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Floor Walk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 516.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 516.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 408.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Floorwalk.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 408.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (70%)
66
20
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Floor Walk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
floorwalk.in
817 ms
plusone.js
120 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
whhg.css
528 ms
animo-animate.css
536 ms
tipsy.css
824 ms
settings.css
837 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
820 ms
style.css
829 ms
responsive.css
824 ms
jquery.totop.js
850 ms
totop.css
1082 ms
pinit.js
47 ms
jquery.js
1332 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1110 ms
jquery.ui.min.js
1111 ms
prettify.js
1109 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
1394 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1607 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1630 ms
animo.js
1355 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
1361 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
1589 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
1620 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
1627 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
1665 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1846 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
1874 ms
jquery.knob.js
1905 ms
superfish.js
1895 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
1899 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1941 ms
custom.js
2104 ms
logo.png
2146 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
13.png
3095 ms
11.png
3918 ms
9.png
3085 ms
8.png
3454 ms
survey_form.jpg
2231 ms
search_people.png
2574 ms
Mystery-Shopper.jpg
2483 ms
graphs.jpg
2740 ms
android.png
513 ms
support-girl.png
2165 ms
webhostinghub-glyphs.ttf
2567 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
portfolio_bg.png
2051 ms
collect
24 ms
QnPGSlp4yHA
80 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
collect
60 ms
pinit_main.js
24 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
19 ms
www-embed-player.js
44 ms
base.js
67 ms
like.php
214 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
33 ms
ad_status.js
61 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
58 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
488 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
556 ms
collect
72 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
59 ms
totopicons.png
1066 ms
tab-left_after.png
1218 ms
timer.png
1309 ms
loader.gif
1344 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
14 ms
jot
83 ms
floorwalk.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
floorwalk.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
floorwalk.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floorwalk.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Floorwalk.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
floorwalk.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Floor Walk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: