12 sec in total
285 ms
11.4 sec
315 ms
Visit fluigent.com now to see the best up-to-date Fluigent content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fluigent.com
Our expertise Fluigent’s broad range of solutions for use in microfluidic and nanofluidic applications offer greater control, automation, precision, and ease of use. If you are seeking to replace high...
Visit fluigent.comWe analyzed Fluigent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
fluigent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,860 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.834
4/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
285 ms
3582 ms
357 ms
449 ms
357 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Fluigent.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Fluigent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 290.1 kB (17%)
1.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Fluigent.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fluigent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 183.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 183.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fluigent.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (8%)
51
47
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fluigent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fluigent.com
285 ms
www.fluigent.com
3582 ms
ZY45DoAwDAQ_RDBUvCcyDlg4joRNAa_naLjandHuNpBXHykToBmYr0JVC1jUI3pIZc6hA1aUpSe7HasaSLLwQOqghxWFN6oz6xMkikf3LDyM_mUmjNMvCNeXV3zO7Q.css
357 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js
449 ms
dZBLDsIwDEQv1HwKSD1PyKd1cRJwnEV7elLYIAiSV543M5a1Clhh9onVWhTCVdmcHDDkBDuJizxLLSOkQf-AMTtPL-okJzl2qJoKQoM60vqonjbpMr-nh5R2SvhaBm948YQwLz1P67O3_3Vo9g2zcT2nJbhzGcbjAWwsi5ApiklBslidLx8xh3JEPAE.js
357 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js
235 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
309 ms
slide1.png
207 ms
logo.png
215 ms
Fluigent-team-gold.jpg
642 ms
twitter-button.png
246 ms
linkedin-button.png
247 ms
googleplus-button.png
245 ms
AFAQ.png
353 ms
slide2.png
205 ms
slide3.png
208 ms
slide4.png
209 ms
slide6.png
209 ms
oem.png
210 ms
mfcs.png
322 ms
fluigent-solutions.png
323 ms
flexibility.png
329 ms
client1.png
322 ms
client2.png
329 ms
client3.png
330 ms
client4.png
477 ms
client5.png
477 ms
client6.png
478 ms
client7.png
479 ms
client8.png
480 ms
client9.png
481 ms
client10.png
632 ms
client11.png
635 ms
client12.png
630 ms
client13.png
637 ms
client14.png
635 ms
client15.png
637 ms
client16.png
790 ms
client17.png
788 ms
client18.png
793 ms
client19.png
790 ms
client20.png
792 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
background-homepage.png
1344 ms
pixel-border-blue.png
446 ms
collect
98 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.otf
541 ms
ProximaNova-SemiboldIt.otf
584 ms
ProximaNova-Bold.otf
652 ms
ProximaNova-Semibold.otf
757 ms
ProximaNova-RegularIt.otf
951 ms
collect
65 ms
slide1.png
893 ms
slide2.png
841 ms
slide3.png
828 ms
slide4.png
1002 ms
slide6.png
1138 ms
oem.png
1285 ms
prev.png
1136 ms
next.png
1141 ms
ajax-loader.gif
6924 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
mfcs.png
1366 ms
client1.png
1308 ms
fluigent-solutions.png
1294 ms
flexibility.png
1315 ms
client2.png
1423 ms
client3.png
1481 ms
client5.png
1409 ms
client4.png
1430 ms
client6.png
1457 ms
client7.png
1540 ms
client8.png
1584 ms
client9.png
1666 ms
client12.png
1533 ms
client10.png
1599 ms
client14.png
1647 ms
client11.png
1674 ms
client15.png
1768 ms
client13.png
1781 ms
client17.png
1691 ms
client16.png
1757 ms
client19.png
1798 ms
client20.png
1870 ms
client18.png
1902 ms
fluigent.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fluigent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fluigent.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fluigent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fluigent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fluigent.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fluigent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: