1.7 sec in total
113 ms
1.4 sec
195 ms
Welcome to flutef.net homepage info - get ready to check Flutef best content right away, or after learning these important things about flutef.net
Precision PTFE Products, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Glass, Bronze Filled PTFE, Carbon Graphite Filled PTFE, Manufacturer, Supplier, Ahmednagar, India
Visit flutef.netWe analyzed Flutef.net page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
flutef.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
113 ms
143 ms
205 ms
61 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Flutef.net, 15% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (558 ms) belongs to the original domain Flutef.net.
Page size can be reduced by 98.6 kB (25%)
398.5 kB
299.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Flutef.net main page is 398.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 175.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.7 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flutef needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 30.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flutef.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (56%)
70
31
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flutef. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flutef.net
113 ms
flutef.net
143 ms
www.flutef.net
205 ms
js
61 ms
style.css
98 ms
custom.css
87 ms
responsive.css
88 ms
style.css
90 ms
jquery.js
127 ms
wowslider.js
112 ms
script.js
116 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
149 ms
owl.js
151 ms
wow.js
126 ms
custom.js
143 ms
css
34 ms
css
33 ms
css
34 ms
animate.css
50 ms
bootstrap.min.css
95 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
61 ms
custom-animate.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
81 ms
icomoon.css
81 ms
imp.css
86 ms
jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css
91 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
112 ms
owl.css
110 ms
owl.theme.default.css
112 ms
flaticon.css
116 ms
nouislider.css
121 ms
nouislider.pips.css
127 ms
timePicker.css
145 ms
jquery-ui.css
144 ms
settings.css
142 ms
layers.css
150 ms
navigation.css
156 ms
polyglot-language-switcher.css
158 ms
style.css
171 ms
email.png
59 ms
logo.webp
60 ms
submenu-icon-3.png
60 ms
slider1.webp
558 ms
slider2.webp
487 ms
slider3.webp
476 ms
bullet.png
63 ms
shadow.png
63 ms
about-us.webp
354 ms
ptfe-bellow.webp
225 ms
ptfe-bush.webp
224 ms
ptfe-full-face-gaskets.webp
299 ms
ptfe-machined-parts.webp
299 ms
ptfe-metal-insert-moldings.webp
372 ms
ptfe-o-rings.webp
462 ms
ptfe-ring-gaskets.webp
420 ms
ptfe-step-gaskets.webp
425 ms
ptfe-tubings.webp
452 ms
ptfe-u-seal.webp
464 ms
ptfe-washers.webp
492 ms
ptfe-valve-seats.webp
537 ms
email-1.png
499 ms
logo-foot.jpg
509 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
137 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
138 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
164 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
200 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
200 ms
Flaticon.svg
487 ms
Flaticon.woff
468 ms
fontawesome-webfont3295.woff
507 ms
embed
311 ms
arrows.png
453 ms
footer.webp
506 ms
1
247 ms
submenu-icon-2.png
368 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
27 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
49 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
49 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
58 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
59 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
60 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
61 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
59 ms
icomoonda59.ttf
372 ms
js
33 ms
user_green_chat.gif
118 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
9 ms
main.js
10 ms
flutef.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
flutef.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
flutef.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flutef.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flutef.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flutef.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flutef. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: