4.6 sec in total
593 ms
3.7 sec
368 ms
Click here to check amazing Folioepress content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about folioepress.com
CMS especializado para medios locales, medios digitales. Gestor de contenidos para periódicos, revistas, magazine y publicaciones digitales profesionales
Visit folioepress.comWe analyzed Folioepress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
folioepress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value8,620 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value21.9 s
1/100
10%
593 ms
22 ms
295 ms
200 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Folioepress.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Folioepress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (43%)
3.2 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Folioepress.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Folioepress images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 563.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 676.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Folioepress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 676.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (43%)
81
46
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Folioepress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
folioepress.com
593 ms
webfont.js
22 ms
bootstrap.css
295 ms
font-awesome.css
200 ms
fontello.css
197 ms
settings.css
204 ms
extralayers.css
202 ms
magnific-popup.css
381 ms
animations.css
392 ms
owl.carousel.css
391 ms
style.css
504 ms
foliopurple.css
397 ms
custom.css
485 ms
javascript.php
310 ms
widgets.js
82 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.min.js
483 ms
bootstrap.min.js
395 ms
modernizr.js
392 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
505 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
594 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
506 ms
owl.carousel.js
589 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
587 ms
jquery.appear.js
670 ms
jquery.countTo.js
693 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
700 ms
jquery.validate.js
781 ms
template.js
782 ms
javascript.php
828 ms
animate.css
667 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
19 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
19 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
19 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
19 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
165 ms
status.php
1651 ms
status.php
300 ms
folioepress-logo.png
296 ms
folioepress-cms-publicacion-digital.png
626 ms
folioepress-modulos-revistas-digitales.png
625 ms
banner_970x90.gif
340 ms
banner_300x300.gif
371 ms
pantallas-ejemplo-periodicos-digitales.png
850 ms
folioepress-cms-periodistas-digitales.png
1139 ms
sobremesa.png
638 ms
avilared.png
632 ms
agrodiario.png
773 ms
laley.png
772 ms
madridpress.png
887 ms
videopopular.png
852 ms
lapauta.png
1058 ms
maspalomasahora.png
966 ms
pagina66.png
1137 ms
benissadigital.png
1149 ms
economiademallorca.png
1174 ms
eldiadigital.png
1259 ms
gomeraverde.png
1246 ms
masquetendencias.png
1326 ms
laopiniondetorrent.png
1330 ms
gentedelasafor.png
1430 ms
zigzagdigital.png
1367 ms
segoviaaldia.png
1526 ms
foliogen_bn.png
1448 ms
sdk.js
43 ms
hero-people.jpg
2036 ms
gridtile_fg.png
1515 ms
folioepress-panel-de-control.png
1666 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1788 ms
ga-audiences
160 ms
fontello.woff
1573 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
132 ms
So7aWFQqjq0
64 ms
157 ms
xd_arbiter.php
21 ms
xd_arbiter.php
38 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
72 ms
www-embed-player.js
109 ms
base.js
161 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
50 ms
share_button.php
219 ms
share_button.php
160 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
18 ms
ad_status.js
74 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
77 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
143 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
118 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
119 ms
jot.html
28 ms
offline_f.png
195 ms
folioepress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
folioepress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
folioepress.com SEO score
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Folioepress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Folioepress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
folioepress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Folioepress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: