Tools & Wizards About Us
fontaine.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

fontaine.de

Fontaine® & Co. GmbH - Sieving technology Made in Germany

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

299 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

fontaine.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fontaine.de homepage info - get ready to check Fontaine best content right away, or after learning these important things about fontaine.de

Sieving technology for the sugar industry. We offer you the complete service for planning, furnishing and operation of all types from a single source.

Visit fontaine.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Fontaine.de page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fontaine.de performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fontaine.de

299 ms

1768 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

351 ms

style.min.css

476 ms

classic-themes.min.css

307 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Fontaine.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Fontaine.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (40%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fontaine.de main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 96.7 kB

  • Original 115.5 kB
  • After minification 110.6 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 95.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fontaine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 650.8 kB

  • Original 888.2 kB
  • After minification 803.2 kB
  • After compression 237.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 650.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 855.4 kB

  • Original 974.3 kB
  • After minification 891.9 kB
  • After compression 118.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fontaine.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 855.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (63%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fontaine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fontaine.de

fontaine.de

299 ms

1768 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

351 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

476 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

307 ms

styles.css

styles.css

273 ms

settings.css

settings.css

373 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

449 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

367 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

537 ms

pikaday.css

pikaday.css

374 ms

core.css

core.css

565 ms

components.css

components.css

651 ms

button.css

button.css

462 ms

style.css

style.css

505 ms

wordpress.css

wordpress.css

550 ms

custom.css

custom.css

549 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

976 ms

front.css

front.css

626 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

850 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

637 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

752 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

804 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

811 ms

index.js

index.js

481 ms

index.js

index.js

574 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

587 ms

countto.js

countto.js

634 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

762 ms

pikaday.js

pikaday.js

668 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

683 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

691 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

763 ms

flexibility.js

flexibility.js

774 ms

functions.js

functions.js

784 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

817 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

820 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

820 ms

logo_fontaine_top.png

logo_fontaine_top.png

134 ms

logo_fontaine_top-1.png

logo_fontaine_top-1.png

133 ms

SetWidth1000-YS2J4460.jpg

SetWidth1000-YS2J4460.jpg

134 ms

SetWidth1000-YS2J9464-bearbeitet.jpg

SetWidth1000-YS2J9464-bearbeitet.jpg

142 ms

SetWidth1000-YS2J8603.jpg

SetWidth1000-YS2J8603.jpg

143 ms

SetWidth1000-YS2J8196.jpg

SetWidth1000-YS2J8196.jpg

229 ms

schnitzelpressensieb_fontaine.jpg

schnitzelpressensieb_fontaine.jpg

624 ms

fontaine-putsch-group.jpg

fontaine-putsch-group.jpg

283 ms

service-fontaine.jpg

service-fontaine.jpg

220 ms

Vertriebspartner.jpg

Vertriebspartner.jpg

243 ms

logo_fontaine_footer.png

logo_fontaine_footer.png

241 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

321 ms

fontaine-bg.jpg

fontaine-bg.jpg

382 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

257 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

266 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

294 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

348 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

349 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

108 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

93 ms

Accessibility Review

fontaine.de accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fontaine.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fontaine.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fontaine.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fontaine.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fontaine.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fontaine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: