Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

foo-food.com

Foo-Food.com - Creative Culinary Marketing Content Video Productions

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

61 ms

foo-food.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to foo-food.com homepage info - get ready to check Foo Food best content right away, or after learning these important things about foo-food.com

Foo-Food.com produce original food & beverage marketing content for top brands and agencies. Serving clients locally and nationwide Filming in the studio or on-location +1 727-301-2832

Visit foo-food.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Foo-food.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foo-food.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.foo-food.com

152 ms

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

69 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a475be57.bundle.min.js

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foo-food.com, 56% (34 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 34% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 985.7 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

769.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Foo-food.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 981.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 216.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 981.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 330.2 kB
  • After minification 328.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foo Food images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 227.8 kB
  • After minification 227.8 kB
  • After compression 225.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (20%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foo Food. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

foo-food.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

foo-food.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

foo-food.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foo-food.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foo-food.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foo Food. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: