3.5 sec in total
157 ms
2.7 sec
697 ms
Welcome to foodconsumer.org homepage info - get ready to check Foodconsumer best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about foodconsumer.org
Visit foodconsumer.orgWe analyzed Foodconsumer.org page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
foodconsumer.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value5.1 s
26/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
157 ms
835 ms
194 ms
231 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foodconsumer.org, 69% (67 requests) were made to Pronamer.com and 27% (26 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) relates to the external source Pronamer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 257.9 kB (18%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodconsumer.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 908.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foodconsumer needs image optimization as it can save up to 172.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodconsumer.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (86%)
64
9
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodconsumer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodconsumer.org
157 ms
835 ms
style.min.css
194 ms
style.min.css
231 ms
style.css
242 ms
all.min.css
32 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
217 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
217 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
221 ms
swiper.min.css
371 ms
post-5.css
396 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
227 ms
global.css
393 ms
post-9.css
240 ms
post-7.css
407 ms
post-121.css
418 ms
ekiticons.css
247 ms
widget-styles.css
261 ms
responsive.css
279 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
448 ms
solid.min.css
546 ms
jquery.min.js
572 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
582 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
594 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
608 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
419 ms
animations.min.css
429 ms
email-decode.min.js
433 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
443 ms
theme.min.js
636 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
741 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
745 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
747 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
749 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
770 ms
ow-slider.min.js
658 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
686 ms
scroll-top.min.js
738 ms
select.min.js
742 ms
frontend-script.js
714 ms
widget-scripts.js
571 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
717 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
566 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
710 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
556 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
702 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
576 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
716 ms
hooks.min.js
541 ms
i18n.min.js
553 ms
frontend.min.js
463 ms
waypoints.min.js
457 ms
core.min.js
465 ms
frontend.min.js
463 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
464 ms
animate-circle.min.js
612 ms
elementor.js
634 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
649 ms
2764.svg
85 ms
10780197_1919761344.png
774 ms
9933441_4323008.png
544 ms
11906541_4860248.png
550 ms
brunoacesc-regular-webfont.woff
67 ms
BG-HomePage-High.png
455 ms
BG-home-new4.png
638 ms
Shapes-icons.png
750 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
57 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
54 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
61 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
60 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
58 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
60 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
60 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
61 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
62 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
63 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
64 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
61 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
62 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
792 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
103 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
107 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
106 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
106 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
106 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
106 ms
QdVUSTchPBm7nuUeVf70viFg.ttf
109 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
807 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
676 ms
elementskit.woff
963 ms
foodconsumer.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
foodconsumer.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
foodconsumer.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodconsumer.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodconsumer.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodconsumer.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foodconsumer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: