9.1 sec in total
2.4 sec
6 sec
674 ms
Welcome to foodgood.in homepage info - get ready to check Food Good best content right away, or after learning these important things about foodgood.in
Get complete information on Indian food recipes and cuisines. The Indian cooking guide for your favourite dishes and food.
Visit foodgood.inWe analyzed Foodgood.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
foodgood.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value8,900 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.153
75/100
15%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
2417 ms
109 ms
188 ms
308 ms
237 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Foodgood.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Foodgood.in.
Page size can be reduced by 566.0 kB (30%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodgood.in main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 298.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 298.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Food Good images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 196.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodgood.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (74%)
76
20
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Food Good. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodgood.in
2417 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
style.min.css
188 ms
frontend.min.css
308 ms
flatpickr.min.css
237 ms
select2.min.css
238 ms
redfont.css
239 ms
widgets.css
233 ms
bootstrap.css
271 ms
style.css
506 ms
style.css
282 ms
css
73 ms
jquery.min.js
375 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
292 ms
flatpickr.min.js
323 ms
select2.min.js
373 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
362 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
377 ms
dom-ready.min.js
398 ms
hooks.min.js
437 ms
i18n.min.js
449 ms
a11y.min.js
450 ms
clipboard.min.js
451 ms
moxie.min.js
562 ms
plupload.min.js
569 ms
underscore.min.js
570 ms
handlers.min.js
576 ms
js
65 ms
adsbygoogle.js
64 ms
js
98 ms
frontend.min.js
628 ms
frontend-form.js
627 ms
repeat-field.js
628 ms
conditional-logic.js
698 ms
core.min.js
699 ms
datepicker.min.js
698 ms
menu.min.js
699 ms
autocomplete.min.js
699 ms
suggest.min.js
699 ms
mouse.min.js
699 ms
slider.min.js
699 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js
752 ms
upload.js
664 ms
bootstrap.js
621 ms
html5.js
621 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
618 ms
jquery.cookie.js
617 ms
scripting.js
788 ms
megamenu.js
618 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
617 ms
affix.js
603 ms
parallax-img.js
572 ms
slick.js
667 ms
flexslider.js
658 ms
ajax-loader.gif
400 ms
logo-1.png
400 ms
Shakshuka-4.jpg
796 ms
lazy-placeholder-4-450x300.jpg
540 ms
default.jpg
541 ms
admin.jpg
540 ms
food-vector-pattern-4.jpg
541 ms
pineapplecut-4.png
542 ms
lazy-placeholder-4-1200x450.jpg
569 ms
show_ads_impl.js
143 ms
zrt_lookup.html
123 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqs.woff
95 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqs.woff
96 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYaQ.woff
183 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7Cw.woff
230 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYaQ.woff
303 ms
redfont.woff
682 ms
cookie.js
299 ms
integrator.js
295 ms
ads
698 ms
collect
123 ms
collect
323 ms
rule-of-third-01-694x450.png
1125 ms
pexels-photo-693267-1200x450.jpeg
112 ms
Groundnut-Right-1-450x300.png
1090 ms
karimeen-mappas-450x300.jpg
1087 ms
web-450x300.jpg
1088 ms
reactive_library.js
952 ms
foodgood.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
foodgood.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
foodgood.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodgood.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodgood.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodgood.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Food Good. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: