11.3 sec in total
247 ms
10 sec
1.1 sec
Visit foodreviewonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Food Review Online content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodreviewonline.com
Food Review online is a Online review website which finds the best restaurants in your city that has some unique touch to thier food or services.
Visit foodreviewonline.comWe analyzed Foodreviewonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
foodreviewonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value6,640 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
247 ms
1784 ms
163 ms
153 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Foodreviewonline.com, 9% (11 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 318.2 kB (6%)
5.3 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodreviewonline.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Food Review Online images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.2 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodreviewonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (69%)
115
36
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Food Review Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodreviewonline.com
247 ms
1784 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
163 ms
widget.css
153 ms
style.min.css
220 ms
styles.css
579 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
288 ms
egpr-style.css
315 ms
font-awesome.min.css
307 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
286 ms
animate.css
303 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
428 ms
style.css
428 ms
font-awesome.min.css
431 ms
magnific-popup.css
428 ms
slick.css
426 ms
iscwp-public.css
493 ms
chosen.css
526 ms
frontend.css
528 ms
style.css
611 ms
login-with-ajax.css
526 ms
sassy-social-share-public.css
604 ms
sassy-social-share-svg.css
784 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
600 ms
font-awesome.min.css
570 ms
animations.min.css
606 ms
frontend.min.css
757 ms
global.css
772 ms
css
140 ms
jetpack.css
769 ms
sbar.css
768 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
802 ms
jquery.js
843 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
893 ms
login-with-ajax.js
902 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
907 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
930 ms
wow.js
917 ms
TweenLite.min.js
121 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
187 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
189 ms
site.js
175 ms
s-202241.js
344 ms
counter.js
485 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
373 ms
gprofiles.js
345 ms
js
174 ms
e-202241.js
385 ms
shortcodes.css
904 ms
egpr-frontend-script.js
798 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
800 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
735 ms
front.js
669 ms
jquery.appear.js
793 ms
photon.min.js
770 ms
css
215 ms
css
259 ms
scripts.js
723 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
722 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
658 ms
js.cookie.min.js
656 ms
woocommerce.min.js
657 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
658 ms
wpgroho.js
627 ms
main.js
650 ms
sassy-social-share-public.js
567 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
563 ms
custom.js
603 ms
justgage.js
597 ms
raphael-2.1.4.min.js
572 ms
wp-embed.min.js
553 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
566 ms
slick.min.js
417 ms
iscwp-public.js
411 ms
webfont.js
230 ms
logo.png
1195 ms
Text-placeholder-2.png
4765 ms
03.png
4613 ms
05.png
5368 ms
Text-placeholder.png
4772 ms
Text-placeholder-1.png
6659 ms
LOGO-2.jpg
4745 ms
02-1.png
4603 ms
04.png
4601 ms
Fotolia_183733325_Subscription_Monthly_M.jpg
4596 ms
4382 ms
Hungry-Head-Mumbai-01.jpg
4985 ms
IMG_20190120_182527-min-1.jpg
5203 ms
Jazz-And-Blues-Mumbai-01-1.jpg
5022 ms
Sweet-Smith-Mumbai-01.jpeg
4925 ms
10-Best-North-Indian-Restaurants-in-Mumbai-3.png
6273 ms
IMG_20190119_224524-min.jpg
4051 ms
37982648_1117645685060080_8052506227604717568_n.jpg
4051 ms
1-1.jpg
4029 ms
IMG_20190317_193502.jpg
4261 ms
1-min-8.jpg
4904 ms
Justice-cafe-and-dine-thane-01.jpg
4029 ms
Burger-Fries-Factory-08.jpg
4599 ms
1-53.jpg
4566 ms
ILLUMINATI-03.jpeg
4597 ms
MH-09-SHETKARI-THANE-01.jpeg
4595 ms
10-Best-North-Indian-Restaurants-in-Mumbai-3.png
5947 ms
hanken-light-webfont.woff
925 ms
hanken-book-webfont.woff
522 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3460 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3486 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
896 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3484 ms
jquery.min.js
3833 ms
css
616 ms
t.php
3904 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff
2545 ms
gen_204
2353 ms
1540 ms
hovercard.min.css
1381 ms
services.min.css
1417 ms
styles.css
8 ms
676002
224 ms
settings-1665339592.json
72 ms
popover.js
3 ms
index-1565701694.html
79 ms
index.css
7 ms
css
15 ms
FoodReviewOnline_-_FRO_-_2019.jpg
165 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
41 ms
22 ms
foodreviewonline.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foodreviewonline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
foodreviewonline.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodreviewonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodreviewonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodreviewonline.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Food Review Online. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: