Tools & Wizards About Us
forefoot.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

forefoot.ru

Персональный сайт доктора Макиняна Левона Гагиковича

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

519 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

218 ms

forefoot.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit forefoot.ru now to see the best up-to-date Forefoot content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about forefoot.ru

Врач травматолог-ортопед Левон Макинян проводит лечение самых сложных случаев. Отзывы.

Visit forefoot.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Forefoot.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

forefoot.ru performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,860 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

forefoot.ru

519 ms

forefoot.ru

553 ms

forefoot.ru

500 ms

page_fc7599d068c5e4491efe155d3ebcd5c7_v1.css

390 ms

template_579a019d9bccbdc089ddb1b11413cf0d_v1.css

395 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Forefoot.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Forefoot.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.3 kB (20%)

Content Size

659.0 kB

After Optimization

524.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Forefoot.ru main page is 659.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 385.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 35.4 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 94.2 kB

  • Original 385.5 kB
  • After minification 291.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Forefoot needs image optimization as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 216.8 kB
  • After compression 212.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forefoot.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forefoot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

forefoot.ru

forefoot.ru

519 ms

forefoot.ru

forefoot.ru

553 ms

forefoot.ru

forefoot.ru

500 ms

page_fc7599d068c5e4491efe155d3ebcd5c7_v1.css

page_fc7599d068c5e4491efe155d3ebcd5c7_v1.css

390 ms

template_579a019d9bccbdc089ddb1b11413cf0d_v1.css

template_579a019d9bccbdc089ddb1b11413cf0d_v1.css

395 ms

main.css

main.css

405 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

38 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

684 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_v1.js

546 ms

dexie3.bundle.min.js

dexie3.bundle.min.js

654 ms

core_ls.min.js

core_ls.min.js

526 ms

core_frame_cache.min.js

core_frame_cache.min.js

541 ms

template_6a1ca8a250404a5d3006f5a0d1231668_v1.js

template_6a1ca8a250404a5d3006f5a0d1231668_v1.js

634 ms

js

js

74 ms

phone.js

phone.js

547 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

794 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

677 ms

api.js

api.js

52 ms

forms.js

forms.js

679 ms

jclock.js

jclock.js

793 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

lite-yt-embed.js

lite-yt-embed.js

792 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

24 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

12 ms

ba.js

ba.js

289 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

71 ms

logo_ru.png

logo_ru.png

185 ms

levon.png

levon.png

319 ms

search-ico.png

search-ico.png

186 ms

soc-icons.png

soc-icons.png

195 ms

eng.png

eng.png

209 ms

order-btn-sprite.png

order-btn-sprite.png

215 ms

doctor-bg.png

doctor-bg.png

454 ms

foot-icon.svg

foot-icon.svg

454 ms

bg-header.png

bg-header.png

329 ms

Untitled-4.png

Untitled-4.png

468 ms

disease-img2.png

disease-img2.png

346 ms

disease-img3.png

disease-img3.png

457 ms

disease-img4.png

disease-img4.png

602 ms

Untitled-3.jpg

Untitled-3.jpg

477 ms

valgus.jpg

valgus.jpg

590 ms

disease-img7.png

disease-img7.png

591 ms

valgus.jpg

valgus.jpg

593 ms

review-icon.png

review-icon.png

602 ms

PTS55F-webfont.woff

PTS55F-webfont.woff

693 ms

PTS75F-webfont.woff

PTS75F-webfont.woff

812 ms

foot-contact-form.png

foot-contact-form.png

670 ms

foot-mail.png

foot-mail.png

672 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

Accessibility Review

forefoot.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

forefoot.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

forefoot.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forefoot.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Forefoot.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

forefoot.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Forefoot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: