4.6 sec in total
699 ms
3.4 sec
571 ms
Visit forfront.pl now to see the best up-to-date Forfront content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about forfront.pl
Profesjonalne pozycjonowanie stron internetowych. Działamy na rynku już ponad 10 lat! Darmowa wycena w ciągu 48h.
Visit forfront.plWe analyzed Forfront.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 699 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
forfront.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
699 ms
181 ms
29 ms
181 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Forfront.pl, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (815 ms) belongs to the original domain Forfront.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 941.4 kB (75%)
1.3 MB
314.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Forfront.pl main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 714.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Forfront needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.7 kB or 70% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 491.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 341.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forfront.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 341.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.forfront.pl
699 ms
layerslider.css
181 ms
css
29 ms
styles.css
181 ms
front-gridder.css
183 ms
settings.css
187 ms
css
40 ms
css
48 ms
main.min.css
190 ms
css
49 ms
bootstrap.min.css
278 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
270 ms
jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css
267 ms
font-awesome.min.css
271 ms
flexslider.css
274 ms
colorbox.css
274 ms
infinite.css
457 ms
style.css
358 ms
greensock.js
448 ms
jquery.js
498 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
365 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
489 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
455 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
642 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
630 ms
modernizr.custom.js
546 ms
jquery.form.min.js
542 ms
scripts.js
545 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
586 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
633 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
635 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
635 ms
bootstrap.js
733 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
733 ms
jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js
734 ms
jquery.smartmenus.keyboard.js
734 ms
jquery.staple.min.js
733 ms
infinite.js
734 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
subtle_stripes.png
116 ms
logo_ff_2.png
175 ms
dummy.png
175 ms
g30.png
300 ms
collect
59 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
54 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
55 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
281 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
53 ms
pFZGRS3ywNfpSqkEIed1Ww.ttf
53 ms
loader.gif
95 ms
bullet.png
105 ms
large_left.png
108 ms
large_right.png
105 ms
overlay.png
165 ms
D86E2A6574.jpg
815 ms
forfront.pl accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
forfront.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
forfront.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forfront.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forfront.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
forfront.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Forfront. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: