1.1 sec in total
96 ms
893 ms
62 ms
Click here to check amazing For Pple content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about forpple.com
Recruitment consultants, Training Solutions, Resume & Interview Skilling, SME consulting and advisory, Useful resources for enhancing your productivity
Visit forpple.comWe analyzed Forpple.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 955 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
forpple.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
96 ms
39 ms
39 ms
25 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Forpple.com, 32% (19 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 20% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 391.8 kB (18%)
2.2 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Forpple.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 360.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 360.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. For Pple images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (22%)
46
36
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of For Pple. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.forpple.com
96 ms
minified.js
39 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
39 ms
polyfill.min.js
25 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
162 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
165 ms
lodash.min.js
162 ms
react.production.min.js
162 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
164 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
161 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
177 ms
c75a09_229689cf07de477885a031c95ef43c3f.jpg
343 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
221 ms
bundle.min.js
90 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
170 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
232 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
171 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
237 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
269 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
237 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
225 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
252 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
323 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
314 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
324 ms
c75a09_06991c273d664b13a351ee97f4adca1d~mv2.png
190 ms
c75a09_401dbdc1150442ad87db0554405a4ff6~mv2.png
261 ms
c75a09_d9fbba5954764e92aec800a59a9a9e32~mv2.png
385 ms
a27d24_e7b0542bd2e14fee89e20110ac57389b~mv2.png
209 ms
a27d24_176cc530b5b54a6fba5f4c92afcccd45~mv2.png
233 ms
a27d24_c86ebaa7289a4f97bcf6949ba1efd8aa~mv2.png
379 ms
c2657caab4f347a69fac6f3c63e2858c.jpg
213 ms
c2657caab4f347a69fac6f3c63e2858c.jpg
296 ms
c75a09_ae040c9cea904a6f8311d52fed09ac56.jpg
485 ms
c75a09_ae040c9cea904a6f8311d52fed09ac56.jpg
426 ms
65895c74a50b42bfa149952b35d25fe0.jpg
351 ms
65895c74a50b42bfa149952b35d25fe0.jpg
439 ms
349757f6ec5e450f88f625641e5055b1.jpg
353 ms
349757f6ec5e450f88f625641e5055b1.jpg
464 ms
cc6285ea524b460cbef3d2a08e55cfe7.jpg
554 ms
cc6285ea524b460cbef3d2a08e55cfe7.jpg
526 ms
5da6025daca645e7baee50a929fe5b82.jpg
428 ms
5da6025daca645e7baee50a929fe5b82.jpg
517 ms
98 ms
97 ms
104 ms
102 ms
101 ms
109 ms
147 ms
145 ms
148 ms
145 ms
145 ms
149 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
forpple.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
forpple.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
forpple.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forpple.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forpple.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
forpple.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of For Pple. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: