Tools & Wizards About Us
foxstang.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

foxstang.com

The Fox Body Mustang Resource - Online Magazine - Foxstang.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

491 ms

foxstang.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to foxstang.com homepage info - get ready to check Foxstang best content right away, or after learning these important things about foxstang.com

All things related to the Fox Body Mustang: Tech articles, fox body history, restoration guides and readers rides. Your #1 source for Fox Mustang content!

Visit foxstang.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Foxstang.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foxstang.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.148

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foxstang.com

66 ms

www.foxstang.com

51 ms

style.min.css

8 ms

extendify-utilities.css

18 ms

bootstrap.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Foxstang.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 709.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Foxstang.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 98.1 kB

  • Original 115.8 kB
  • After minification 110.6 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 526.0 kB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 4.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foxstang images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

  • Original 457.4 kB
  • After minification 439.3 kB
  • After compression 389.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 82.6 kB
  • After minification 82.6 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foxstang.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (43%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foxstang. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

foxstang.com

foxstang.com

66 ms

www.foxstang.com

www.foxstang.com

51 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

8 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

18 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

28 ms

fotorama.css

fotorama.css

34 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

41 ms

zoom.css

zoom.css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

34 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

43 ms

page.js

page.js

107 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

55 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

249 ms

js

js

112 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

54 ms

fotorama.js

fotorama.js

55 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

80 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

52 ms

raf-polyfill.js

raf-polyfill.js

81 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

82 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

85 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

84 ms

zoom.min.js

zoom.min.js

89 ms

md-scripts.js

md-scripts.js

82 ms

FOXSTANG-LOGO-90.png

FOXSTANG-LOGO-90.png

25 ms

S04E84.png

S04E84.png

37 ms

DSC_5733-200x170.jpg

DSC_5733-200x170.jpg

27 ms

Foxbody-Map-Pocket-Fix-200x170.jpg

Foxbody-Map-Pocket-Fix-200x170.jpg

26 ms

Mustang-Suspension-200x170.png

Mustang-Suspension-200x170.png

26 ms

SV902-Foxbody-Brushed-Bronze-Tinted-8-of-8-200x170.jpg

SV902-Foxbody-Brushed-Bronze-Tinted-8-of-8-200x170.jpg

27 ms

hoonifox.png

hoonifox.png

29 ms

featured.jpg

featured.jpg

28 ms

Kerry-88-notch-pic7.jpg

Kerry-88-notch-pic7.jpg

30 ms

000-gear-selection-fox.jpg

000-gear-selection-fox.jpg

30 ms

finished-front.jpg

finished-front.jpg

33 ms

feature-hood-strut-install.jpg

feature-hood-strut-install.jpg

115 ms

cut-up-fox.jpg

cut-up-fox.jpg

89 ms

feature1986.jpg

feature1986.jpg

36 ms

feature1985.jpg

feature1985.jpg

34 ms

feature1984.jpg

feature1984.jpg

89 ms

css

css

104 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

22 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

76 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

116 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

144 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

146 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

150 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

637 ms

S04E33.jpg

S04E33.jpg

78 ms

S04E19.png

S04E19.png

82 ms

Quarter-Windows.png

Quarter-Windows.png

80 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

328 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

30 ms

ads

ads

671 ms

sodar

sodar

91 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

15 ms

runner.html

runner.html

22 ms

aframe

aframe

46 ms

fox-body-mustang-engine-specs.jpg

fox-body-mustang-engine-specs.jpg

13 ms

Gordon-85-pic3.jpg

Gordon-85-pic3.jpg

46 ms

feature1993.jpg

feature1993.jpg

13 ms

feature1992.jpg

feature1992.jpg

13 ms

feature1991.jpg

feature1991.jpg

14 ms

feature1990.jpg

feature1990.jpg

14 ms

feature1989.jpg

feature1989.jpg

15 ms

feature1988.jpg

feature1988.jpg

51 ms

feature1987.jpg

feature1987.jpg

15 ms

-DbLkJJK3YZOSOasYi6rcjkBM_N5vpNI48728xD2bD8.js

-DbLkJJK3YZOSOasYi6rcjkBM_N5vpNI48728xD2bD8.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

foxstang.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

foxstang.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

foxstang.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxstang.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxstang.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foxstang.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foxstang. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: