Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

462 ms

friendlane.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Friendlane content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about friendlane.com

Friendlane is a list of free bookmarking website of Free social bookmarking list, it an open source for your social link building

Visit friendlane.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Friendlane.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

friendlane.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

friendlane.com

197 ms

www.friendlane.com

239 ms

style.css

69 ms

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

analytics.js

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Friendlane.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 19% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) belongs to the original domain Friendlane.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

241.4 kB

After Optimization

175.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Friendlane.com main page is 241.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 125.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 84.2 kB
  • After minification 83.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Friendlane images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 38.6 kB

  • Original 125.9 kB
  • After minification 125.7 kB
  • After compression 87.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Friendlane.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (63%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Friendlane. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

friendlane.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

friendlane.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Friendlane.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Friendlane.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Friendlane. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: