Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

frill.co

Frill - A Customer feedback, Roadmap and Announcements tool.

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

965 ms

frill.co screenshot

About Website

Welcome to frill.co homepage info - get ready to check Frill best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about frill.co

Frill helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.

Visit frill.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Frill.co page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

frill.co performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,450 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

frill.co

144 ms

frill.co

373 ms

f7145a7f7d15e994c14f4c7c.js

51 ms

lib.js

49 ms

plausible.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Frill.co, 10% (6 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (673 ms) belongs to the original domain Frill.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Frill.co main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 961.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 77.1 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 961.0 kB
  • After minification 961.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Frill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 87.4 kB
  • After minification 87.4 kB
  • After compression 85.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (35%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Frill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

frill.co accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

frill.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

frill.co SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Frill.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Frill.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Frill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: