4.2 sec in total
59 ms
3.2 sec
891 ms
Click here to check amazing Fullfact content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fullfact.com
Improve what you cannot see - Decide4Action offers the best OEE solution to help your company improve its production performance.
Visit fullfact.comWe analyzed Fullfact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
fullfact.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value2,850 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.216
58/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
59 ms
342 ms
355 ms
67 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Fullfact.com, 49% (40 requests) were made to Decide4action.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 279.5 kB (9%)
3.0 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Fullfact.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fullfact images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fullfact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (77%)
64
15
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fullfact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fullfact.com
59 ms
fullfact.com
342 ms
355 ms
override_custom.css
67 ms
css2
49 ms
slick.css
130 ms
slick-theme.css
189 ms
styles.css
190 ms
styles.css
189 ms
css
69 ms
style.css
252 ms
page-builder.css
260 ms
settings.css
193 ms
styles.min.css
250 ms
style.min.css
252 ms
style-core.css
255 ms
gdlr-style-custom.css
266 ms
ytprefs.min.css
313 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
33 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
438 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
335 ms
app.js
378 ms
js
82 ms
ytprefs.min.js
335 ms
script-new.js
335 ms
slick.js
535 ms
index.js
375 ms
index.js
376 ms
script.js
540 ms
page-builder.js
536 ms
5315011.js
115 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
537 ms
effect.min.js
537 ms
script-core.js
538 ms
fitvids.min.js
538 ms
wp-consent-api.min.js
539 ms
gtm.js
265 ms
new-logo.png
244 ms
D4A-Website-Image-3.png
448 ms
D4A-Website-Image-6.png
249 ms
OEE-Graphic.png
244 ms
D4A-PageToolkit-1.png
446 ms
OEE-Production-Graph.png
244 ms
OEE-Production-Graph.png
246 ms
footer-logo.svg
246 ms
Decide4ction_Consulting_Reverse_Color-1024x620.png
323 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf
813 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
1028 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
955 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
953 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
1028 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
232 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
231 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf
1013 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf
1027 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf
1096 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf
1075 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf
1096 ms
analytics.js
774 ms
insight.min.js
847 ms
destination
410 ms
js
555 ms
fbevents.js
783 ms
4cc4b94980124a2f9cbd1cad4d53e47a.js.ubembed.com
910 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
771 ms
collectedforms.js
806 ms
fb.js
775 ms
5315011.js
806 ms
5315011.js
769 ms
loader.js
437 ms
380 ms
landing
354 ms
collect
208 ms
collect
169 ms
537527730099265
255 ms
bundle.js
86 ms
call-tracking_9.js
9 ms
22 ms
wcm
16 ms
zi-tag.js
74 ms
fullfact.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fullfact.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
fullfact.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fullfact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fullfact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fullfact.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fullfact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: