Tools & Wizards About Us
fullgleam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

fullgleam.com

Car Accessories and Care, Auto Body Parts, Detailing, Batteries & More

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

371 ms

fullgleam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fullgleam.com homepage info - get ready to check Fullgleam best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about fullgleam.com

An auto accessories blog you can rely on. We’re here to help & always in search of the best car accessory to help you improve your driving moment.

Visit fullgleam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fullgleam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fullgleam.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fullgleam.com

105 ms

js

18 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

thrive_flat.css

132 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Fullgleam.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fullgleam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

889.9 kB

After Optimization

753.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fullgleam.com main page is 889.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 332.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 76.7 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 332.7 kB
  • After minification 332.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fullgleam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 237.8 kB
  • After minification 237.8 kB
  • After compression 212.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 242.1 kB
  • After minification 241.9 kB
  • After compression 191.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fullgleam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (63%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fullgleam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fullgleam.com

fullgleam.com

105 ms

js

js

18 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

thrive_flat.css

thrive_flat.css

132 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

55 ms

reset.css

reset.css

53 ms

main_green.css

main_green.css

78 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1217 ms

sassy-social-share-public.css

sassy-social-share-public.css

87 ms

sassy-social-share-svg.css

sassy-social-share-svg.css

113 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

105 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

112 ms

moxie.min.js

moxie.min.js

124 ms

plupload.min.js

plupload.min.js

116 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

182 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

183 ms

example.js

example.js

1239 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

45 ms

js

js

74 ms

onejs

onejs

11 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

45 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

170 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

170 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

171 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

186 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

172 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

173 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

172 ms

sassy-social-share-public.js

sassy-social-share-public.js

185 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

191 ms

main.js

main.js

243 ms

Full-Gleam-256x48-Logo-Head.png

Full-Gleam-256x48-Logo-Head.png

75 ms

homepage-image-3.jpg

homepage-image-3.jpg

149 ms

hybrid-homepage1-divider.png

hybrid-homepage1-divider.png

75 ms

all-terrain-mechanics-creeper.jpg

all-terrain-mechanics-creeper.jpg

82 ms

floor-jack-reviews.jpg

floor-jack-reviews.jpg

75 ms

garage-cabinets-and-workbenches.jpg

garage-cabinets-and-workbenches.jpg

78 ms

best-hydraulic-wheel-dolly.jpg

best-hydraulic-wheel-dolly.jpg

81 ms

Chemical-Guys-3.jpg

Chemical-Guys-3.jpg

76 ms

Meguiars-3.jpg

Meguiars-3.jpg

80 ms

car-guys-3.jpg

car-guys-3.jpg

92 ms

Tesla-3.jpg

Tesla-3.jpg

93 ms

James-Evans-165x165-3.jpg

James-Evans-165x165-3.jpg

146 ms

Philip-Benton-3.jpg

Philip-Benton-3.jpg

145 ms

Kristine-Rhodes-3.jpg

Kristine-Rhodes-3.jpg

145 ms

1.png

1.png

146 ms

hybrid-homepage-lightbox.png

hybrid-homepage-lightbox.png

147 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

15 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf

63 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

65 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

65 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

65 ms

neILzCirqoswsqX9zoKmNg.ttf

neILzCirqoswsqX9zoKmNg.ttf

65 ms

70 ms

Accessibility Review

fullgleam.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fullgleam.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fullgleam.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fullgleam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fullgleam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fullgleam.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fullgleam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: