1.9 sec in total
262 ms
1.1 sec
556 ms
Click here to check amazing Funkalender content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about funkalender.no
Markedets mest solgte online julekalender. Skap mersalg i desember og få nye kunder du kan følge opp med tilbud hele neste år.
Visit funkalender.noWe analyzed Funkalender.no page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
funkalender.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.132
81/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
262 ms
187 ms
26 ms
32 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Funkalender.no, 78% (39 requests) were made to Julekalender.no and 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) relates to the external source Julekalender.no.
Page size can be reduced by 70.3 kB (9%)
784.9 kB
714.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Funkalender.no main page is 784.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Funkalender images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Funkalender.no has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)
41
20
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Funkalender. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
funkalender.no
262 ms
www.julekalender.no
187 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
css
32 ms
font-awesome.css
87 ms
elegant-font.css
151 ms
style.css
53 ms
page-builder.css
67 ms
style-core.css
79 ms
gdlr-style-custom.css
47 ms
mmenu.css
86 ms
style.css
180 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
95 ms
xdomain-data.js
89 ms
registration.js
91 ms
uc.js
117 ms
script.js
230 ms
page-builder.js
114 ms
effect.min.js
119 ms
mmenu.js
137 ms
jquery.superfish.js
138 ms
script-core.js
142 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
logo-light.svg
142 ms
logo-product-julekalender-dark.svg
90 ms
Julekalender-for-Facebook.png
145 ms
mestergron-w.png
142 ms
oya-w.png
143 ms
bache-gabrielsen-w.png
145 ms
Julekalender-editor-2024.jpg
91 ms
Funksjoner-2019-1.gif
93 ms
Julekalender-Cases-600x315.png
93 ms
cg-case-600x315.png
233 ms
icon-product-advent-calendar.svg
137 ms
julekalender-live-3-768x576.png
138 ms
julekalender-epostlister-3-768x576.png
147 ms
julekalender-markedsforing-3-768x576.png
188 ms
nb.png
257 ms
da.png
272 ms
sv.png
297 ms
en.png
271 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
26 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
36 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
56 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
67 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
68 ms
museosansrounded-700-webfont.ttf
226 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
136 ms
iynllh28
68 ms
funkalender.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
funkalender.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
funkalender.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Funkalender.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Funkalender.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
funkalender.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Funkalender. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: