Tools & Wizards About Us
fusion-radiology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

fusion-radiology.com

Fusion Radiology - Quality Tele-radiology Reporting Services

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

fusion-radiology.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fusion-radiology.com now to see the best up-to-date Fusion Radiology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fusion-radiology.com

We provides reporting service on various modalities including Ultrasound (MSK guided injections), MRI, Dental CBCT scan and X-rays.

Visit fusion-radiology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fusion-radiology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fusion-radiology.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.504

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fusion-radiology.com

272 ms

fusion-radiology.com

536 ms

script.js

44 ms

style.min.css

365 ms

styles.css

411 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Fusion-radiology.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fusion-radiology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fusion-radiology.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 607.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 114.7 kB

  • Original 607.0 kB
  • After minification 492.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fusion Radiology needs image optimization as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 386.5 kB
  • After minification 386.5 kB
  • After compression 385.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 178.7 kB
  • After minification 178.7 kB
  • After compression 173.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fusion-radiology.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (74%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fusion Radiology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fusion-radiology.com

fusion-radiology.com

272 ms

fusion-radiology.com

fusion-radiology.com

536 ms

script.js

script.js

44 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

365 ms

styles.css

styles.css

411 ms

all.css

all.css

42 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

124 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

559 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

444 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

442 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

454 ms

css

css

80 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

823 ms

dynamic.css

dynamic.css

435 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

773 ms

style.css

style.css

770 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

890 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

781 ms

modernizr.custom.46504.js

modernizr.custom.46504.js

907 ms

js

js

95 ms

js

js

95 ms

css

css

70 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1096 ms

index.js

index.js

1108 ms

index.js

index.js

1133 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1358 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1557 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1223 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1428 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

1430 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js

1442 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

1561 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1688 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1871 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1754 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

1887 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1869 ms

api.js

api.js

75 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1901 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

2005 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2091 ms

index.js

index.js

2205 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

2257 ms

js

js

63 ms

log

log

432 ms

fusion-radiology-logo.png

fusion-radiology-logo.png

1503 ms

Radiology-Specialists-of-the-Year-2019.-1.jpg

Radiology-Specialists-of-the-Year-2019.-1.jpg

1287 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

1504 ms

collage1-1072x800.jpeg

collage1-1072x800.jpeg

1852 ms

ultrasound-forum-pic1.jpeg

ultrasound-forum-pic1.jpeg

1979 ms

ivf-ultrasound-scaled-1-480x319.jpeg

ivf-ultrasound-scaled-1-480x319.jpeg

1734 ms

ultrasound-p-480x318.jpg

ultrasound-p-480x318.jpg

1875 ms

hay-fever-480x270.jpeg

hay-fever-480x270.jpeg

1768 ms

content_bottom.png

content_bottom.png

2214 ms

iso-9001-white.png

iso-9001-white.png

2179 ms

rss.png

rss.png

2095 ms

font

font

49 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

2366 ms

font

font

129 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

16 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

46 ms

Accessibility Review

fusion-radiology.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fusion-radiology.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fusion-radiology.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fusion-radiology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fusion-radiology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fusion-radiology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fusion Radiology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: