11.1 sec in total
2.3 sec
8.4 sec
311 ms
Visit futureconsiderations.com now to see the best up-to-date Futureconsiderations content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futureconsiderations.com
We work with our clients to build their capacity for the future, as practitioners in leadership development, business partnering & teal organisations. Contact us.
Visit futureconsiderations.comWe analyzed Futureconsiderations.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
futureconsiderations.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
2348 ms
27 ms
62 ms
95 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Futureconsiderations.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Futureconsiderations.com.
Page size can be reduced by 242.9 kB (14%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Futureconsiderations.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futureconsiderations images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (52%)
67
32
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futureconsiderations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futureconsiderations.com
2348 ms
count.js
27 ms
js
62 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
195 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
296 ms
page.js
36 ms
addtoany.min.js
293 ms
public.js
299 ms
core.min.js
297 ms
tooltip.min.js
292 ms
custom.min.js
303 ms
lazyload.min.js
359 ms
api.min.js
38 ms
header-colour-strip.svg
227 ms
search-icon.svg
230 ms
white-hero-angle.svg
232 ms
orange-triangle-right.svg
233 ms
back-to-top.svg
234 ms
js
75 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
sm.25.html
43 ms
eso.KJQApO2n.js
65 ms
footnotes-jqttbrpl0.min.css
248 ms
admin-ajax.php
3193 ms
style.min.css
335 ms
shortcodes.css
256 ms
public.css
261 ms
style.css
280 ms
addtoany.min.css
326 ms
collect
71 ms
collect
102 ms
futureconsiderations.com
478 ms
fc-logo-orange.svg
135 ms
iStock_whereculturesmeet_lowres.jpg
371 ms
1596555242712-1024x490.jpeg
489 ms
globe-fc-1024x683.jpeg
342 ms
1598226596487-1024x683.jpeg
576 ms
1597499165700-1024x703.jpeg
496 ms
sky.jpg
452 ms
FC_flag-1.png
601 ms
FC_swirl-1.png
529 ms
FC_earth-1.png
565 ms
logo-nhs.png
573 ms
logo-pwc.png
606 ms
logo-shell.png
642 ms
logo-tesco.png
651 ms
logo-thameswater.png
653 ms
logo-aiesec.png
678 ms
logo-ba.png
683 ms
logo-britishcouncil.png
719 ms
logo-cadbury.png
727 ms
logo-cdkn.png
728 ms
logo-hsbc.png
755 ms
logo-kpmg.png
760 ms
Context-768x384.jpg
796 ms
photo-1524464234682-5fa90fea2e71-768x512.jpeg
803 ms
shutterstock_523522765-768x501.jpg
805 ms
fc_logo_white_2.png
831 ms
ga-audiences
40 ms
grey-grad.svg
771 ms
arrow@2x.png
807 ms
orange-grad-top.svg
814 ms
orange-grad-bottom.svg
821 ms
twitter-icon.svg
842 ms
linkedin-icon.svg
849 ms
facebook-icon.svg
839 ms
footer-colour-strip.svg
828 ms
futureconsiderations.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
futureconsiderations.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
futureconsiderations.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureconsiderations.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Futureconsiderations.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futureconsiderations.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Futureconsiderations. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: