Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

futureflight.aero

FutureFlight | Aviation International News

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

715 ms

Page Rendered

261 ms

futureflight.aero screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Future Flight content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futureflight.aero

FutureFlight

Visit futureflight.aero

Key Findings

We analyzed Futureflight.aero page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 976 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futureflight.aero performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futureflight.aero

30 ms

gpt.js

169 ms

hky3iuy.css

98 ms

c7a26296c376117bbca1.css

14 ms

skydrive_production_launch_march2024.jpg

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Futureflight.aero, 21% (10 requests) were made to Cdn.cncms.aero and 10% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (403 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.cncms.aero.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

698.9 kB

After Optimization

521.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Futureflight.aero main page is 698.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 314.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 168.7 kB

  • Original 204.2 kB
  • After minification 204.2 kB
  • After compression 35.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 314.3 kB
  • After minification 306.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Future Flight images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 180.4 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB
  • After compression 180.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (69%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Flight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

futureflight.aero accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

futureflight.aero best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

futureflight.aero SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureflight.aero can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futureflight.aero main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Future Flight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: