7.6 sec in total
404 ms
7 sec
200 ms
Click here to check amazing Futurescope content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futurescope.jp
オプティマイズ株式会社は、東京都渋谷区にオフィスを構える"ITベンチャー企業"です。 「Made by us. オリジナルにこだわり、当社(私たち)にしか創れないものを創る」 オリジナルを追求した自社プロダクトの企画・開発を行っています。
Visit futurescope.jpWe analyzed Futurescope.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
futurescope.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.2 s
29/100
10%
Value1,740 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
404 ms
946 ms
305 ms
320 ms
324 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Futurescope.jp, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Futurescope.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 376.5 kB (34%)
1.1 MB
719.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurescope.jp main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 604.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurescope images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 250.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurescope.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (47%)
81
43
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurescope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futurescope.jp
404 ms
www.futurescope.jp
946 ms
import.css
305 ms
backoffice.css
320 ms
company.css
324 ms
mobile.css
328 ms
team.css
329 ms
group.css
504 ms
newmeasure.css
610 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.css
641 ms
ob_contents.css
642 ms
styles.css
678 ms
meteor-slides.css
688 ms
jquery.js
1308 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
930 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
1322 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
984 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
993 ms
slideshow.js
1009 ms
wpsf-js.php
1493 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
1777 ms
jquery.vgrid.0.1.7.js
1329 ms
jquery.lightpop-0.8.5.1.min.js
1541 ms
smartRollover.js
1643 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1639 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.min.js
1785 ms
jquery.timers-1.2.js
1816 ms
jquery.form.js
1855 ms
scripts.js
1809 ms
delete.css
1670 ms
style.css
1787 ms
thumblist.css
1836 ms
elements.css
2064 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
165 ms
ga.js
77 ms
btn_pagetop.png
319 ms
description.gif
324 ms
logo.gif
329 ms
01_bg.png
339 ms
close_o.png
342 ms
02_off.png
440 ms
04_off.png
620 ms
05_off.png
634 ms
06_off.png
664 ms
08_01_bg.png
660 ms
8_topics_off.png
686 ms
8_press_off.png
761 ms
8_home_off.png
924 ms
8_privacy_off.png
974 ms
8_inquiry_off.png
964 ms
btn_more_off.gif
1008 ms
tail_160.png
1169 ms
frame_02_a.png
1064 ms
10.gif
1282 ms
tail_data1.jpg
1288 ms
tail_map.jpg
1304 ms
tail_160.png
1491 ms
frame_04_a.png
1402 ms
tail.png
1822 ms
frame_05_a.png
1589 ms
tail.png
1799 ms
tail.png
1905 ms
%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB-2.png
2208 ms
frame_05_b.png
1814 ms
17.jpg
1894 ms
tail.png
2320 ms
frame_06_a.png
2115 ms
tail.png
2466 ms
tail1.png
2556 ms
tail_1601.png
2428 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
tail_1601.png
2441 ms
b59363343336128d53c695dc673e25c2.png
2587 ms
logo_f.gif
2339 ms
bg_topics.png
2460 ms
bg_press.png
2453 ms
bg_02_a.png
2561 ms
bg_04_a.png
2501 ms
bg_05_a.png
2369 ms
bg_05_b.png
2494 ms
bg_06_a.png
2471 ms
lightpop-btn-prev.gif
2560 ms
lightpop-btn-next.gif
163 ms
futurescope.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
futurescope.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
futurescope.jp SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurescope.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurescope.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurescope.jp
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurescope. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: