2.5 sec in total
153 ms
1.6 sec
759 ms
Welcome to photo.foodgawker.com homepage info - get ready to check Photo Foodgawker best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about photo.foodgawker.com
Come feed your eyes! Discover, search and share the best food blogger recipes.
Visit photo.foodgawker.comWe analyzed Photo.foodgawker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
photo.foodgawker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,310 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
153 ms
134 ms
147 ms
211 ms
240 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Photo.foodgawker.com, 23% (15 requests) were made to Static.foodgawker.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Photo2.foodgawker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (622 ms) relates to the external source Photo2.foodgawker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 738.1 kB (23%)
3.3 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Photo.foodgawker.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Foodgawker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 470.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photo.foodgawker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (13%)
63
55
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Foodgawker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
photo.foodgawker.com
153 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
134 ms
5c8b1642f3e1e4d51910832ef73311b6.73c8c306a4812e8a1a734c0027b7b62d.css
147 ms
537b609334dda0c2739d8713bcbf3ed6.a87daf404a998e14886216d065ac859f.js
211 ms
gpt.js
240 ms
gpt_mobile.js
256 ms
ga.js
397 ms
header-repeat_6-7-13.jpg
39 ms
2582465.jpg
548 ms
2582462.jpg
377 ms
2582176.jpg
427 ms
2582384.jpg
522 ms
2581862.jpg
522 ms
2582166.jpg
538 ms
2581926.jpg
537 ms
2582262.jpg
563 ms
2581934.jpg
545 ms
2582134.jpg
577 ms
25814491.jpg
577 ms
2582342.jpg
594 ms
retina-icons.png
353 ms
fg-logo_6-7-13.png
352 ms
sprite-a.20140610.png
353 ms
card-hover-top.png
424 ms
card-hover-btm.png
424 ms
addthis-blank.gif
423 ms
2581872.jpg
563 ms
2581966.jpg
561 ms
2582246.jpg
575 ms
2582357.jpg
562 ms
2581902.jpg
569 ms
2581950.jpg
577 ms
2581896.jpg
622 ms
2582434.jpg
622 ms
2582294.jpg
621 ms
2582185.jpg
622 ms
footer-texture.jpg
285 ms
Lato-Regular-webfont.woff
279 ms
Lato-Bold-webfont.woff
286 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
217 ms
footer-bar-texture.jpg
313 ms
quant.js
273 ms
loading-bar.gif
179 ms
__utm.gif
108 ms
__utm.gif
119 ms
ads
437 ms
container.html
67 ms
208 ms
pixel;r=912669464;a=p-ac23cN1QUP2Is;fpan=1;fpa=P0-585742591-1456868150020;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456868150019;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fphoto.foodgawker.com%2F;ogl=site_name.foodgawker%2Ctitle.foodgawker%2Ctype.blog%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Ffoodgawker%252Ecom%2Cdescription.feed%20your%20eyes
34 ms
227025.jpg
310 ms
226981.jpg
251 ms
393139.jpg
248 ms
393117.jpg
265 ms
393087.jpg
273 ms
393127.jpg
302 ms
393161.jpg
303 ms
227007a.jpg
302 ms
227003.jpg
325 ms
226991.jpg
302 ms
226979.jpg
302 ms
227023.jpg
269 ms
226985.jpg
278 ms
393173.jpg
249 ms
393075.jpg
243 ms
393097.jpg
302 ms
osd.js
61 ms
photo.foodgawker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
photo.foodgawker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
photo.foodgawker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photo.foodgawker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Photo.foodgawker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
photo.foodgawker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photo Foodgawker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: