929 ms in total
30 ms
509 ms
390 ms
Welcome to service.futuremark.com homepage info - get ready to check Service Futuremark best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about service.futuremark.com
Share and compare benchmark scores from 3DMark, PCMark and VRMark benchmarks. Check out the world's fastest PCs in our Overclocking Hall of Fame.
Visit service.futuremark.comWe analyzed Service.futuremark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 899 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
service.futuremark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value5,900 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value11.7 s
18/100
10%
30 ms
92 ms
84 ms
112 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Service.futuremark.com, 46% (18 requests) were made to 3dmark.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (112 ms) relates to the external source Ajax.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.9 kB (26%)
573.5 kB
425.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Service.futuremark.com main page is 573.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 338.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Service Futuremark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.9 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Service.futuremark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (28%)
29
21
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Service Futuremark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
service.futuremark.com
30 ms
www.3dmark.com
92 ms
jquery.min.js
84 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
112 ms
css
51 ms
fAsamvd8YOpTHxFtgEgEM7rqIGsLL3VeCI1EayetN5E.css
7 ms
642MrLih0r9VMuzO0hdsydkE0qhelG7Cj4f3MPDT7Uv.css
69 ms
GP12wCB6jRSXQlOOWvSQhl2F2A0eJKZeMSyKG7twnLm.js
93 ms
9V4d3LjcpAmTsmKqJXbHAXqfLqaZwIK3oRLB586KNTD.css
39 ms
oAT3WLfAF2PfhQQHuXTUG3FgKYqZGqochtzqTL54pUw.js
38 ms
navigationRibbonJs
38 ms
3dmark_productline_bgr_776e6b.jpg
71 ms
3dmarkxlogo.png
69 ms
forumlatestpostsfeed
26 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
56 ms
46 ms
41 ms
52 ms
mostpopular
61 ms
li.png
31 ms
3dmark-logo.png
32 ms
3dmark-fire-strike-cb2.jpg
32 ms
3dmark11-cb.jpg
53 ms
3dmark-vantage-cb.jpg
57 ms
fmlogo.png
31 ms
futuremark_logo.svg
39 ms
bg_repeat.png
42 ms
down.png
39 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
59 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
61 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
71 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
72 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
73 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
72 ms
collect
33 ms
bubble16.png
31 ms
collect
61 ms
ga-audiences
46 ms
service.futuremark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
service.futuremark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
service.futuremark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Service.futuremark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Service.futuremark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
service.futuremark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Service Futuremark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: