Tools & Wizards About Us
casehistories.geoengineer.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

casehistories.geoengineer.org

ISSMGE International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

468 ms

casehistories.geoengineer.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Case Histories Geoengineer content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about casehistories.geoengineer.org

The “International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories” covers the broad area of practice in geotechnical engineering (soils and rocks), geotechnical earthquake engineering, environmental geotech...

Visit casehistories.geoengineer.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Casehistories.geoengineer.org page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casehistories.geoengineer.org performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.204

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

casehistories.geoengineer.org

72 ms

pub

109 ms

jquery-2.1.0.min.js

58 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

54 ms

jquery.tag-it.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Casehistories.geoengineer.org, 60% (56 requests) were made to Geocasehistoriesjournal.org and 19% (18 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) relates to the external source Geocasehistoriesjournal.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (27%)

Content Size

7.9 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Casehistories.geoengineer.org main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.3 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 38.4 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

  • Original 7.2 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Case Histories Geoengineer needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 76.0 kB

  • Original 590.4 kB
  • After minification 590.4 kB
  • After compression 514.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 36.8 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casehistories.geoengineer.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (69%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Case Histories Geoengineer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

casehistories.geoengineer.org

casehistories.geoengineer.org

72 ms

pub

pub

109 ms

jquery-2.1.0.min.js

jquery-2.1.0.min.js

58 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

54 ms

jquery.tag-it.js

jquery.tag-it.js

92 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

93 ms

fontController.js

fontController.js

94 ms

general.js

general.js

94 ms

jqueryValidatorI18n.js

jqueryValidatorI18n.js

95 ms

Helper.js

Helper.js

115 ms

ObjectProxy.js

ObjectProxy.js

103 ms

Handler.js

Handler.js

113 ms

LinkActionRequest.js

LinkActionRequest.js

122 ms

Feature.js

Feature.js

121 ms

SiteHandler.js

SiteHandler.js

128 ms

UrlInDivHandler.js

UrlInDivHandler.js

147 ms

AutocompleteHandler.js

AutocompleteHandler.js

158 ms

ExtrasOnDemandHandler.js

ExtrasOnDemandHandler.js

170 ms

FormHandler.js

FormHandler.js

169 ms

AjaxFormHandler.js

AjaxFormHandler.js

144 ms

ClientFormHandler.js

ClientFormHandler.js

167 ms

GridHandler.js

GridHandler.js

190 ms

LinkActionHandler.js

LinkActionHandler.js

183 ms

SearchFormHandler.js

SearchFormHandler.js

193 ms

ReportGeneratorFormHandler.js

ReportGeneratorFormHandler.js

201 ms

LuceneAutocompleteHandler.js

LuceneAutocompleteHandler.js

214 ms

jquery.pkp.js

jquery.pkp.js

240 ms

jquery.browser.min.js

jquery.browser.min.js

242 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

246 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

242 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

243 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

46 ms

css

css

36 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

244 ms

fullcalendar.css

fullcalendar.css

296 ms

xcharts.min.css

xcharts.min.css

306 ms

select2.css

select2.css

307 ms

style.css

style.css

287 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

333 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

89 ms

js

js

80 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

24 ms

jquery.justifiedgallery.min.js

jquery.justifiedgallery.min.js

325 ms

tinymce.min.js

tinymce.min.js

317 ms

jquery.tinymce.min.js

jquery.tinymce.min.js

251 ms

devoops.js

devoops.js

261 ms

ijgch.png

ijgch.png

78 ms

cover_article_383_en_US.png

cover_article_383_en_US.png

79 ms

cover_article_384_en_US.png

cover_article_384_en_US.png

82 ms

cover_article_385_en_US.png

cover_article_385_en_US.png

79 ms

cover_article_362_en_US.jpg

cover_article_362_en_US.jpg

80 ms

cover_article_379_en_US.jpg

cover_article_379_en_US.jpg

80 ms

cover_article_377_en_US.png

cover_article_377_en_US.png

138 ms

cover_article_376_en_US.png

cover_article_376_en_US.png

140 ms

cover_article_373_en_US.png

cover_article_373_en_US.png

225 ms

ijgch.jpg

ijgch.jpg

139 ms

geoworld.png

geoworld.png

138 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

139 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

219 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

227 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

51 ms

ppub_config

ppub_config

107 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

ads

ads

103 ms

container.html

container.html

35 ms

latest_posts.php

latest_posts.php

542 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

18 ms

settings

settings

81 ms

17083231932303751288

17083231932303751288

292 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

290 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

292 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

46 ms

18374333559937787151

18374333559937787151

281 ms

icon.png

icon.png

283 ms

10245349733381557468

10245349733381557468

289 ms

6672269888578788175

6672269888578788175

296 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

251 ms

geocasehistory

geocasehistory

59 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

4 ms

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

21 ms

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

24 ms

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

34 ms

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

48 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

47 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

48 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

47 ms

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

14 ms

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

15 ms

profileThumbnail.png

profileThumbnail.png

67 ms

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

3 ms

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

12 ms

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

8 ms

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

12 ms

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

casehistories.geoengineer.org accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

casehistories.geoengineer.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

casehistories.geoengineer.org SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casehistories.geoengineer.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Casehistories.geoengineer.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casehistories.geoengineer.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Case Histories Geoengineer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: