Tools & Wizards About Us
en.gepur.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

en.gepur.com

Women's clothing, shoes and accessories | Gepur

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

569 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

en.gepur.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing En Gepur content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about en.gepur.com

Designer women's clothing - dresses, suits, trousers, blouses ❤️ Outerwear, shoes and accessories ✨ Unique high-quality clothes ✨ Discount up to -50% on wholesale orders (from 5 units)

Visit en.gepur.com

Key Findings

We analyzed En.gepur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 569 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

en.gepur.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value28,310 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.185

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

en.gepur.com

569 ms

jivosite.js

237 ms

gtm.js

245 ms

36eef3707a8758220ccb.css

410 ms

a3afd854c228d16b8de2.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original En.gepur.com, 24% (5 requests) were made to Img.gepur.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Img.gepur.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

918.1 kB

After Optimization

854.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of En.gepur.com main page is 918.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 836.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 63.3 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 81.8 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 836.2 kB
  • After minification 836.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. En Gepur images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of En Gepur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

en.gepur.com

en.gepur.com

569 ms

jivosite.js

jivosite.js

237 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

245 ms

36eef3707a8758220ccb.css

36eef3707a8758220ccb.css

410 ms

a3afd854c228d16b8de2.css

a3afd854c228d16b8de2.css

245 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

347 ms

webpack-9b6fead40d5d2e5a3296.js

webpack-9b6fead40d5d2e5a3296.js

298 ms

framework-dafe7eda0e1500f9ff8a.js

framework-dafe7eda0e1500f9ff8a.js

575 ms

main-28a28cdf90038fe13a3b.js

main-28a28cdf90038fe13a3b.js

569 ms

_app-05af97909dc65c2d7717.js

_app-05af97909dc65c2d7717.js

571 ms

9879-14a8203d2d3068a0c899.js

9879-14a8203d2d3068a0c899.js

573 ms

index-710f3c7dc2b14498a5d4.js

index-710f3c7dc2b14498a5d4.js

682 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

679 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

687 ms

125-337770.jpg

125-337770.jpg

570 ms

fe8d2fc15c3f6d46760bd6671e47c668.jpg

fe8d2fc15c3f6d46760bd6671e47c668.jpg

789 ms

b60ff16f9b5d7dacaf3711517bf729f8.jpg

b60ff16f9b5d7dacaf3711517bf729f8.jpg

1028 ms

21f567174a2adcc776dc7e158d06eb44.jpg

21f567174a2adcc776dc7e158d06eb44.jpg

788 ms

c1e8451cf94b259efedd558da19a589c.jpg

c1e8451cf94b259efedd558da19a589c.jpg

750 ms

roboto-v29-latin_cyrillic-regular.woff

roboto-v29-latin_cyrillic-regular.woff

323 ms

roboto-condensed-v19-latin_cyrillic-700.woff

roboto-condensed-v19-latin_cyrillic-700.woff

375 ms

Accessibility Review

en.gepur.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

en.gepur.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

en.gepur.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise En.gepur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that En.gepur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

en.gepur.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of En Gepur. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: