1.9 sec in total
16 ms
1.7 sec
176 ms
Click here to check amazing G content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about g.network
Get full fibre broadband with G.Network. With us, you will get 100mb all the way to 10gb with our ultrafast, reliable broadband. Find your fibre speed now!
Visit g.networkWe analyzed G.network page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
g.network performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value6,680 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.6 s
0/100
10%
16 ms
161 ms
420 ms
64 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original G.network, 4% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (984 ms) belongs to the original domain G.network.
Page size can be reduced by 174.1 kB (77%)
227.4 kB
53.3 kB
In fact, the total size of G.network main page is 227.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 111.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. G images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (90%)
48
5
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of G. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
g.network
16 ms
www.g.network
161 ms
www.g.network
420 ms
gynxluzz2i
64 ms
gtm.js
76 ms
optimize.js
48 ms
d4c1789f443d1601dbc1.css
103 ms
gnetwork-logo-reverse.webp
43 ms
polyfills-21de158d45fc2bb71107.js
190 ms
b34b391e3452b7d1d5099f93e04a10faf7cbea6c.4ec06c0079124f99c1d0.js
262 ms
56.34331ed416bf6bc94084.js
262 ms
c8f7fe3b0e41be846d5687592cf2018ff6e22687.4712b9e6e6ba34d6c5bd.js
391 ms
174.ac1d2f041432b73cb768.js
301 ms
179.2682a3e651b91ce19015.js
308 ms
112.6d3391092c2e8ca362f1.js
273 ms
180.b7bc5a140a778e93419b.js
340 ms
188.d7d0e90d1c4776a1e67c.js
388 ms
74.7f6f0d3b00411c524e25.js
400 ms
135.a90575ef97061033bcae.js
382 ms
113.5e274f51de60e2e05727.js
432 ms
125.e278b6f0c2d1bd941d9a.js
421 ms
84.70d9b54cb34575430d95.js
464 ms
129.2182fb1a3310ab9dda38.js
514 ms
93.7804af9f3974018fecfe.js
518 ms
123.39d64b6ab6db7cd42b42.js
482 ms
122.dcc08c5e66c096cf0567.js
502 ms
83.ef251572e1820ab8eff1.js
554 ms
65.35d71d20778fe659d3de.js
586 ms
99.0d739e4545a35ca77070.js
606 ms
54.169257adae1bbbf9577e.js
671 ms
173.386ed08ef2f6bf6721ce.js
649 ms
177.36ddb4fc79e1048cc463.js
603 ms
176.5b9e575e0665d5b68b36.js
643 ms
webpack-35b2182bd68da29ad07a.js
709 ms
framework.a923ff751f88405104dc.js
739 ms
b17d23752a8fb667973ccd4f4e59cdc64bf5d077.ecc30aae5a987aa7d3c9.js
689 ms
main-6f0cca8066e95a16cd10.js
726 ms
29107295.e54482c2d519d53bbc60.js
813 ms
d39c0b8ddd497eab9efcc87c711015ef14b872d5.97062a2bf3893061f7ea.js
984 ms
790c6de388a0a5a124a605a6c68308e36a83f1a2.77966c026804296221b4.js
816 ms
37446409f96eaea366e930f5275df25d631a5d3e.4568422cc785c50a9ee3.js
793 ms
4c31a6f94cd6042b66a59f2ac40aa63136954e39.c4ee665b6b5c16843c69.js
809 ms
8764aea244c622a0157f9491e5f453c9d6ed3716.d0a64a4dda2289d9aee9.js
980 ms
clarity.js
40 ms
uc.js
19 ms
_app-285bc315e85fcd9e0d38.js
894 ms
%5B%5B...slug%5D%5D-9e9d71f8dfb9f1e31199.js
696 ms
_buildManifest.js
683 ms
_ssgManifest.js
683 ms
NeueHaasGrotText-55Roman-Web.woff
787 ms
NeueHaasGrotDispRound-65Medium-Web.woff2
739 ms
dots-lg.svg
727 ms
c.gif
6 ms
g.network accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
g.network best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
g.network SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise G.network can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that G.network main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
g.network
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of G. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: