2.3 sec in total
493 ms
1.7 sec
133 ms
Welcome to gadgetkeeper.com homepage info - get ready to check Gadget Keeper best content right away, or after learning these important things about gadgetkeeper.com
Visit gadgetkeeper.comWe analyzed Gadgetkeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
gadgetkeeper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
493 ms
124 ms
125 ms
223 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Gadgetkeeper.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Sumome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (642 ms) belongs to the original domain Gadgetkeeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 723.2 kB (42%)
1.7 MB
998.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Gadgetkeeper.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 863.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gadget Keeper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 363.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 263.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gadgetkeeper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 263.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (57%)
53
23
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gadget Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gadgetkeeper.com
493 ms
tabcontent.css
124 ms
style.css
125 ms
jquery.js
223 ms
styles.css
163 ms
jquery.js
251 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
external-tracking.min.js
260 ms
nivoslider4wp.css
259 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
294 ms
load.sumome.com
402 ms
bootstrap.css
290 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
351 ms
bootstrap.js
358 ms
jquery.form.min.js
376 ms
scripts.js
375 ms
wp-embed.min.js
440 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
225 ms
ga.js
32 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
header_bg.jpg
160 ms
logo.png
161 ms
banner_bg.jpg
160 ms
loading.gif
160 ms
4_s.jpeg
473 ms
5_s.jpeg
517 ms
15_s.jpeg
265 ms
16_s.jpeg
260 ms
h_boxicon_1.png
264 ms
h_boxicon_2.png
212 ms
h_boxicon_3.png
335 ms
h_boxicon_4.png
386 ms
h_boxicon_5.png
381 ms
h_boxicon_6.png
389 ms
sublink_arrowh.jpg
472 ms
shadow.jpg
515 ms
right_img.jpg
472 ms
right_btn.jpg
515 ms
border.png
595 ms
facebook.png
537 ms
twitter.png
593 ms
linkedin.png
624 ms
footer_logo.png
638 ms
169340d7-b657-4dce-9eb1-88f27ee52ed0.js
5 ms
Trade%20Gothic%20LT%20Bold.woff
642 ms
a.gif
74 ms
305 ms
service.js
10 ms
sme-popup.css
8 ms
css
26 ms
load
257 ms
slid_arrow_left.png
126 ms
slid_arrow_right.png
130 ms
gadgetkeeper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
gadgetkeeper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gadgetkeeper.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gadgetkeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gadgetkeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gadgetkeeper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gadget Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: