5.4 sec in total
542 ms
4.6 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing Gallooliveoil content for Portugal. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gallooliveoil.com
100 years of dedication to your table.
Visit gallooliveoil.comWe analyzed Gallooliveoil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Gallooliveoil.com rating and web reputation
gallooliveoil.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value22.2 s
0/100
25%
Value26.3 s
0/100
10%
Value900 ms
31/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
542 ms
1548 ms
235 ms
224 ms
729 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Gallooliveoil.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Gallooliveoil.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (24%)
4.4 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Gallooliveoil.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 339.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gallooliveoil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 494.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 494.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gallooliveoil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (47%)
55
29
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gallooliveoil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gallooliveoil.com
542 ms
int-en.aspx
1548 ms
BenefitsRichText.css
235 ms
font.css
224 ms
gallo.css
729 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.css
232 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
229 ms
WebResource.axd
343 ms
ScriptResource.axd
767 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
607 ms
jquery.bxSlider.js
413 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
585 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
492 ms
jquery.bxSlider.js
524 ms
selectBox.js
617 ms
radiocheck.js
642 ms
swfobject.js
727 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.js
758 ms
Main.js
757 ms
Main_ui.js
766 ms
products.js
763 ms
compare.js
784 ms
pastime.js
819 ms
belmonte.js
865 ms
idangerous.swiper.js
871 ms
jquery.cookie.js
888 ms
TweenMax.min.js
7 ms
jquery-ui.js
8 ms
logo.png
365 ms
ImageGen.ashx
981 ms
ImageGen.ashx
441 ms
ImageGen.ashx
495 ms
ImageGen.ashx
593 ms
ImageGen.ashx
733 ms
imagens_premio_en.png
439 ms
bg-overlay.png
506 ms
destaque_azeitenovo.jpg
841 ms
slide_jv_br_semcopy.png
984 ms
destaquesglobal_2000x500_vinagrepremium_v2.png
1206 ms
destaquesglobal_2000x500_vinagredaily_v2.png
1331 ms
destaque_gallo.jpg
985 ms
destaque_azeitenovo_slide_doyzip_v2_semcopy.jpg
1105 ms
img-gallo-sprite.png
1014 ms
img-gallo-buttons.png
1107 ms
bg-hp-contact.png
1115 ms
bg-sep.gif
1130 ms
bg-footer-shadow.png
1228 ms
opensans-semibold-webfont.svg
1362 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.svg
1370 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.svg
1432 ms
ga.js
57 ms
sdk.js
92 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
95 ms
53 ms
xd_arbiter.php
78 ms
xd_arbiter.php
135 ms
opensans-semibold-webfont.woff
125 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
130 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
122 ms
xd_arbiter.php
40 ms
gallooliveoil.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gallooliveoil.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gallooliveoil.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gallooliveoil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gallooliveoil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gallooliveoil.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gallooliveoil. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: