2.6 sec in total
223 ms
2.1 sec
323 ms
Visit gatewayec.com now to see the best up-to-date Gateway Ec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gatewayec.com
We just moved our location! After spending the past 6 years in Coventry we have moved to Somers. We are now located at 34D Egypt Road, Somers, CT Our new phone number is 860-749-4600. Please stop by...
Visit gatewayec.comWe analyzed Gatewayec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
gatewayec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.172
69/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
223 ms
71 ms
144 ms
213 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Gatewayec.com, 53% (40 requests) were made to Gatewayec.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Gateway-enterprise.rivikhosting.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (969 ms) relates to the external source Gatewayec.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 781.8 kB (33%)
2.4 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Gatewayec.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 194.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gateway Ec needs image optimization as it can save up to 194.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 357.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 357.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 191.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gatewayec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 191.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (55%)
71
32
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gateway Ec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gatewayec.com
223 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
71 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
144 ms
woocommerce.css
213 ms
general.css
149 ms
admin.css
150 ms
style.css
286 ms
responsive.css
144 ms
css
28 ms
jetpack.css
292 ms
jquery.js
354 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
280 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
281 ms
plugins.js
486 ms
script.js
418 ms
js
26 ms
jquery.gomap-1.3.2.min.js
419 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
419 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
424 ms
woocommerce.min.js
533 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
569 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
570 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
569 ms
wp-embed.min.js
569 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
common.js
30 ms
util.js
32 ms
geocoder.js
30 ms
ga.js
30 ms
gateway-pressure-washers-header-logo.png
204 ms
header-bg.png
352 ms
header-bevel.png
199 ms
header-gradient.png
201 ms
search-magnify.png
202 ms
main-stripes.png
202 ms
header-divider.png
203 ms
NEW-WHITCO-MODEL2-4035-RESIZED-1120x356.jpg
482 ms
uncratin-1120x3561-1120x356.jpg
603 ms
wes_werkin-1120x3561-1120x356.jpg
528 ms
bob_wirkin-1120x3561-1120x356.jpg
558 ms
heading.png
326 ms
bob-pw-300x168.jpg
549 ms
WhitcoLogo-300x132.png
554 ms
ice-dam-removal-1-150x150.jpg
969 ms
WHITCO-2525-S-WITH-RAPID-REEL-MOUNTED-TO-PEO-2-150x150.jpg
667 ms
New-Whitco-Arrival-3030H-side-RESIZED-150x150.jpg
674 ms
SS-3100-SWITCH-SIDE-RESIZED-150x150.jpg
693 ms
footer-headings.png
697 ms
footer-arrow.png
740 ms
navigation-bg.png
208 ms
saltaway3.jpg
197 ms
taginator-guy-300x202.png
347 ms
icon-facebook.png
197 ms
icon-wordpress.png
197 ms
zoom-icon-article.png
317 ms
UK4l2VEpwjv3gdcwbwXE9InF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
Luunk03-uSz9LnB7oNEUuvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
34 ms
all.js
268 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
gatewayec.com
437 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
56 ms
g.gif
3 ms
bullet-nav.png
550 ms
arrows.png
554 ms
120 ms
xd_arbiter.php
222 ms
xd_arbiter.php
412 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
141 ms
intercom.v1.js
57 ms
ping
84 ms
44 ms
intercom.f348a2fe.js
47 ms
gatewayec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
gatewayec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
gatewayec.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gatewayec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gatewayec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gatewayec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gateway Ec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: