4 sec in total
572 ms
2.8 sec
620 ms
Click here to check amazing G C Global content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gcglobal.in
We help you earn 100% to 300% ROI through unique Real Estate Investment Opportunities in India that are available ONLY BY INVITATION. Click to learn more.
Visit gcglobal.inWe analyzed Gcglobal.in page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gcglobal.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
19/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value9.1 s
13/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
572 ms
162 ms
157 ms
63 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Gcglobal.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) belongs to the original domain Gcglobal.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (48%)
3.4 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Gcglobal.in main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. G C Global images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 512.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcglobal.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 512.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)
65
24
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of G C Global. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gcglobal.in
572 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
admin_icon.min.css
157 ms
css
63 ms
css
82 ms
css
88 ms
css
96 ms
styles.css
171 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
176 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
182 ms
rgs.css
180 ms
font-awesome.min.css
230 ms
style.css
421 ms
responsive.css
257 ms
form-basic.min.css
264 ms
js_composer.css
269 ms
jquery.js
383 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
340 ms
modernizr.js
348 ms
ProgressCircle.js
356 ms
jquery.vc_chart.js
363 ms
core.min.js
466 ms
widget.min.js
468 ms
position.min.js
468 ms
menu.min.js
470 ms
autocomplete.min.js
470 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
470 ms
jquery.form.min.js
469 ms
scripts.js
470 ms
superfish.js
481 ms
respond.js
492 ms
nicescroll.js
481 ms
sticky.js
524 ms
prettyPhoto.js
538 ms
isotope.min.js
639 ms
init.js
832 ms
infinitescroll.js
560 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
668 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
608 ms
nectar-slider.js
702 ms
comment-reply.min.js
544 ms
wp-embed.min.js
610 ms
js_composer_front.js
605 ms
GC-Logo.png
304 ms
GCG-Logo-Retina.png
341 ms
return8-300x300.png
361 ms
coins15-300x300.png
352 ms
stars10-300x300.png
372 ms
ribbon87-300x300.png
392 ms
internet16-300x300.png
821 ms
store5-300x300.png
821 ms
Untitled-21.jpg
825 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
778 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
28 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
57 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIETamuWRjOQSPxoOXgdYd7c.ttf
67 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
68 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
777 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
777 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
777 ms
icomoon.woff
776 ms
steadysets.ttf
777 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
964 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
54 ms
diagonal_line.png
95 ms
NEW-AlakanandaVijayawada.jpg
556 ms
Starlit-Suites-SHIRDI-Homepage-Scrolling-Banner-1.jpg
255 ms
NEW-Devanahalli.jpg
230 ms
NEW-Starlit-Suites-Tirupati.jpg
356 ms
NEW-50-in-18-Months.jpg
257 ms
NEW-Starlit-Suites-Hyderabad.jpg
377 ms
NEW-Starlit-Suites-Pune.jpg
305 ms
Homepage-Starlit-Cochin.jpg
424 ms
NEW-AlakanandaHosur.jpg
344 ms
nectar-loading.gif
380 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
202 ms
gcglobal.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gcglobal.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gcglobal.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcglobal.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gcglobal.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gcglobal.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of G C Global. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: