9.2 sec in total
279 ms
8.2 sec
761 ms
Click here to check amazing GCIS content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gcis.co.uk
Information solutions experts: managed IT services, cabling and infrastructure, cloud services, connectivity, CCTV & access and more.
Visit gcis.co.ukWe analyzed Gcis.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
gcis.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value27.2 s
0/100
25%
Value33.4 s
0/100
10%
Value6,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.142
78/100
15%
Value36.3 s
0/100
10%
279 ms
4629 ms
51 ms
139 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Gcis.co.uk, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gcis.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (67%)
2.6 MB
856.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gcis.co.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 213.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 213.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GCIS images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcis.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (76%)
58
14
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GCIS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gcis.co.uk
279 ms
www.gcis.co.uk
4629 ms
js
51 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
367 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
396 ms
js_composer.min.css
734 ms
css
95 ms
main.min.css
652 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
377 ms
all.min.css
556 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
458 ms
wpbakery.min.css
474 ms
post-type.min.css
645 ms
css-vars.css
591 ms
custom.css
912 ms
media.css
796 ms
mega-menu.css
726 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
793 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
833 ms
style.css
822 ms
style.min.css
825 ms
headings.min.css
844 ms
animate.min.css
982 ms
stats-counter.min.css
915 ms
jquery.min.js
915 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
921 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
975 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1041 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1046 ms
headings.min.js
1046 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1058 ms
countUp.min.js
1063 ms
custom.min.js
1095 ms
linkid.js
29 ms
collect
19 ms
gcis_logo_white57.png
86 ms
dummy.png
86 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
50 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
59 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
58 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
60 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
60 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
113 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
113 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
100 ms
logo-microsoft-a.png
146 ms
logo-hp-a.png
148 ms
logo-dell-a.png
144 ms
logo-excel-a.png
146 ms
logo-cisco-a.png
148 ms
logo-zyxel-a.png
167 ms
logo-avg-a.png
236 ms
logo-paxton-access-a.png
238 ms
scott-graham-5fNmWej4tAA-unsplash-scaled.jpg
727 ms
css
31 ms
animate.min.css
249 ms
rs6.css
352 ms
main.min.js
386 ms
rbtools.min.js
506 ms
rs6.min.js
736 ms
legacy.min.js
384 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
430 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
431 ms
post-type.min.js
466 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
528 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
529 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
569 ms
gcis.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gcis.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gcis.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcis.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gcis.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gcis.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GCIS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: